Skip to main content

Lucid Trading

7.8 B+
United States Futures
VS

Savius

7.3 B+
Spain Futures
Key Differences
Price $90 vs $285

Verdict: Who Wins?

Lucid Trading 4 wins Decisive Win
4 - 0
Savius 0 wins
Overall Rating 7.8 vs 7.3 Clear
TrustPilot 4.7 vs 4.5 Clear
Starting Price $90 vs $285 Decisive
Profit Split Both 90% Tie
Safety Grade Both B+ Tie
Trust Score 65.4/100 vs 62.9/100 Narrow

Best For:

Budget-conscious traders Lucid Trading
Trust & reputation Lucid Trading
Fast payouts Savius

Visual Comparison

Lucid Trading Savius

Head-to-Head Comparison

Lucid Trading Metric Savius
7.8/10 PFM Score 7.3/10
4.7/5 (3,788) TrustPilot 4.5/5 (188)
B+ Safety Grade B+
65.4 B Trust Score 62.9 B
90% Profit Split Up to 90% (sim/demo phase); 80% (Live phase)
None (LucidPro $25K), EOD on larger sizes Daily Drawdown $400 / $800 / $1,300 / $2,000 / $4,000 (hard breach, based on daily starting balance)
On-demand Payout Frequency On-demand (no monthly limit)
$90 Starting Price $285
White-Label Technology White-Label
NinjaTrader, Tradovate, Quantower, MotiveWave, Rithmic Platforms Quantower, Atas, dxFeed, Volumetrica, DeepDom, DeepCharts
No Direct Path to Funded No
United States Country Spain
- Established Jan 2013
4 options Challenge Options 5 options

Price Comparison by Account Size

Cheapest challenge price at each account size (where both firms offer the same size)

Account Size Lucid Trading Savius Savings
$25K $90 $285 Save $195
$50K $120 $399 Save $279
$100K $180 $599 Save $419
$150K $245 $759 Save $514

Lucid Trading vs Savius: Detailed Analysis

Lucid Trading and Savius are both Futures firms.

In terms of pricing, Lucid Trading is more affordable with challenges starting at $90, which is $195 less than Savius's starting price of $285. Lucid Trading offers 4 challenge options, while Savius offers 5.

Lucid Trading offers 90% profit split, while Savius offers Up to 90% (sim/demo phase); 80% (Live phase). Lucid Trading pays out On-demand, and Savius pays out On-demand (no monthly limit).

For trust and reputation, Lucid Trading has a 4.7/5 TrustPilot rating with 3,788 reviews, while Savius has 4.5/5 with 188 reviews. Safety grades: Lucid Trading B+, Savius B+.

Overall, Lucid Trading edges ahead winning 4 out of 4 categories we compared. However, the best choice depends on your specific needs - both firms have their strengths.

Pros & Cons

Lucid Trading
Pros
Fast payouts (avg 15 min), EOD drawdown, no hard breach rules, 250,000+ traders, $150M+ paid out, promo code VAULT
Cons
LucidFlex and LucidDirect pricing not publicly accessible (JS-rendered)
Savius
Pros
Instant funded accounts (no evaluation), no time limits, news trading allowed, fast 72-hour payouts via RISE, 5 account sizes from $25K to $300K, up to 90% profit split during sim/demo phase, transparent fixed pricing
Cons
Mandatory monthly data feed fee ($90 CME/NYMEX/COMEX + optional $30 Eurex + $20 L2), no overnight or weekend positions, 20% consistency rule, hard daily DD breach (no soft breach), HFT/grid/arbitrage/auto-bots/flipping/hedging prohibited

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better, Lucid Trading or Savius?

Lucid Trading scores higher overall, winning 4 out of 4 comparison categories including Overall Rating, TrustPilot, Starting Price. However, the best choice depends on your trading goals and priorities.

Which is cheaper, Lucid Trading or Savius?

Lucid Trading has the lower starting price at $90. Lucid Trading offers 4 challenge options starting from $90, while Savius offers 5 options starting from $285.

Which has better reviews, Lucid Trading or Savius?

Lucid Trading has a higher TrustPilot rating of 4.7/5. Lucid Trading has 3,788 reviews while Savius has 188.

Which offers a higher profit split, Lucid Trading or Savius?

Lucid Trading offers a higher maximum profit split. Lucid Trading offers 90% while Savius offers Up to 90% (sim/demo phase); 80% (Live phase).

How fast do Lucid Trading and Savius pay out?

Lucid Trading has On-demand payouts while Savius offers On-demand (no monthly limit) payouts. Payout speed can be an important factor when choosing a prop firm.