Verdict: Who Wins?
Quant Tekel (Ascendx)
2 wins
Top One Trader
4 wins
Decisive Win
Best For:
Top One Trader
Top One Trader
Quant Tekel (Ascendx)
Quant Tekel (Ascendx)
Visual Comparison
Head-to-Head Comparison
| Quant Tekel (Ascendx) | Metric | Top One Trader |
|---|---|---|
| 7.7/10 | PFM Score | 8.0/10 ★ |
| 4.3/5 (12,362) | TrustPilot | 4.5/5 (3,141) ★ |
| A ★ | Safety Grade | B+ |
| 66.6 B ★ | Trust Score | 62.3 B |
| 80% (up to 90%) | Profit Split | 80% standard, up to 90% (up to 100% on Instant PRIME) ★ |
| 3-4% daily, 6-10% max (varies by program) | Daily Drawdown | 4-5% (4% on 2-Step Plus, 5% on 1-Step Flash; EquityShield 2%/2.5% on Instant) |
| Bi-weekly (Prime) / On-demand (Instant, Power) | Payout Frequency | Bi-weekly (14 days), 7-day upgrade add-on available |
| $26 | Starting Price | $$16 ★ |
| White-Label | Technology | White-Label |
| cTrader, MT5, TradeLocker | Platforms | cTrader, Match Trader, MT5, TradeLocker |
| No | Direct Path to Funded | No |
| South Africa | Country | United States |
| Oct 2023 | Established | Sep 2023 |
| 11 options | Challenge Options | 12 options |
Price Comparison by Account Size
Cheapest challenge price at each account size (where both firms offer the same size)
| Account Size | Quant Tekel (Ascendx) | Top One Trader | Savings |
|---|---|---|---|
| $5K | $26 | $16 ★ | Save $10 |
| $10K | $52 ★ | $65 | Save $13 |
| $25K | $105 | $105 | Same price |
| $50K | $210 | $205 ★ | Save $5 |
| $100K | $400 | $325 ★ | Save $75 |
| $200K | $1,300 | $1,065 ★ | Save $235 |
Quant Tekel (Ascendx) vs Top One Trader: Detailed Analysis
Quant Tekel (Ascendx) and Top One Trader are both CFD firms. Top One Trader has been in business longer, established in 2023, while Quant Tekel (Ascendx) was founded in 2023.
In terms of pricing, Top One Trader is more affordable with challenges starting at $16, which is $10 less than Quant Tekel (Ascendx)'s starting price of $26. Quant Tekel (Ascendx) offers 11 challenge options, while Top One Trader offers 12.
Quant Tekel (Ascendx) offers 80% (up to 90%) profit split, while Top One Trader offers 80% standard, up to 90% (up to 100% on Instant PRIME). Quant Tekel (Ascendx) pays out Bi-weekly (Prime) / On-demand (Instant, Power), and Top One Trader pays out Bi-weekly (14 days), 7-day upgrade add-on available.
For trust and reputation, Quant Tekel (Ascendx) has a 4.3/5 TrustPilot rating with 12,362 reviews, while Top One Trader has 4.5/5 with 3,141 reviews. Safety grades: Quant Tekel (Ascendx) A, Top One Trader B+.
Overall, Top One Trader edges ahead winning 4 out of 6 categories we compared. However, the best choice depends on your specific needs - both firms have their strengths.
Pros & Cons
Quant Tekel (Ascendx)
Pros
Cons
Top One Trader
Pros
Cons
Active Deals & Promo Codes
Quant Tekel (Ascendx)
Top One Trader
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is better, Quant Tekel (Ascendx) or Top One Trader?
Top One Trader scores higher overall, winning 4 out of 6 comparison categories including Overall Rating, TrustPilot, Starting Price. However, the best choice depends on your trading goals and priorities.
Which is cheaper, Quant Tekel (Ascendx) or Top One Trader?
Top One Trader has the lower starting price at $16. Quant Tekel (Ascendx) offers 11 challenge options starting from $26, while Top One Trader offers 12 options starting from $16.
Which has better reviews, Quant Tekel (Ascendx) or Top One Trader?
Top One Trader has a higher TrustPilot rating of 4.5/5. Quant Tekel (Ascendx) has 12,362 reviews while Top One Trader has 3,141.
Which offers a higher profit split, Quant Tekel (Ascendx) or Top One Trader?
Top One Trader offers a higher maximum profit split. Quant Tekel (Ascendx) offers 80% (up to 90%) while Top One Trader offers 80% standard, up to 90% (up to 100% on Instant PRIME).
How fast do Quant Tekel (Ascendx) and Top One Trader pay out?
Quant Tekel (Ascendx) has Bi-weekly (Prime) / On-demand (Instant, Power) payouts while Top One Trader offers Bi-weekly (14 days), 7-day upgrade add-on available payouts. Payout speed can be an important factor when choosing a prop firm.