Skip to main content

DNA Funded

2.3 B
Saint Lucia CFD
VS

Ment Funding

3.0 B+
United States CFD

Verdict: Who Wins?

DNA Funded 2 wins
2 4
Ment Funding 4 wins Our Pick
Overall Rating 3.0 vs 2.3
TrustPilot 4.9 vs 3.5
Starting Price $49 vs $250
Profit Split Both Up to 90% (80% default, upgradeable to 90% with add-on)
Safety Grade B+ vs B
Challenge Variety 18 vs 6 options
Platform Choice 5 vs 2 platforms

Best For:

Budget-conscious traders DNA Funded
Trust & reputation Ment Funding
Fast payouts Ment Funding

Visual Comparison

DNA Funded Ment Funding

Head-to-Head Comparison

DNA Funded Metric Ment Funding
2.3/10 PFM Score 3.0/10
3.5/5 (88) TrustPilot 4.9/5 (227)
B Safety Grade B+
Up to 90% (80% default, upgradeable to 90% with add-on) Profit Split 75% (up to 90%)
4-5% daily, 6-8% total (varies by plan). HFT/hedging/grid/martingale prohibited. Daily Drawdown 3% daily (futures) / 5% daily (CFD) / 6% max static
First payout after 14 days (7 days with add-on) Payout Frequency On demand
$49 Starting Price $250
Proprietary Technology White-Label
MT5, TradeLocker Platforms DXTrade, cTrader, Match Trader, MT5, MT4
No Direct Path to Funded No
Saint Lucia Country United States
Jan 2024 Established Oct 2021
18 options Challenge Options 6 options

Price Comparison by Account Size

Cheapest challenge price at each account size (where both firms offer the same size)

Account Size DNA Funded Ment Funding Savings
$25K $159 $250 Save $91
$50K $289 $450 Save $161
$100K $549 $750 Save $201
$200K $1,079 $1,500 Save $421

DNA Funded vs Ment Funding: Detailed Analysis

DNA Funded and Ment Funding are both CFD firms. Ment Funding has been in business longer, established in 2021, while DNA Funded was founded in 2024.

In terms of pricing, DNA Funded is more affordable with challenges starting at $49, which is $201 less than Ment Funding's starting price of $250. DNA Funded offers 18 challenge options, while Ment Funding offers 6.

DNA Funded offers Up to 90% (80% default, upgradeable to 90% with add-on) profit split, while Ment Funding offers 75% (up to 90%). DNA Funded pays out First payout after 14 days (7 days with add-on), and Ment Funding pays out On demand.

For trust and reputation, DNA Funded has a 3.5/5 TrustPilot rating with 88 reviews, while Ment Funding has 4.9/5 with 227 reviews. Safety grades: DNA Funded B, Ment Funding B+.

Overall, Ment Funding edges ahead winning 4 out of 6 categories we compared. However, the best choice depends on your specific needs — both firms have their strengths.

Pros & Cons

DNA Funded
Pros
Backed by ASIC-regulated DNA Markets, 800+ trading instruments, affordable pricing from $49, TradeLocker platform, 1:50 leverage
Cons
Relatively new firm (2024), limited reviews on TrustPilot, only one platform (TradeLocker), no instant funding option
Ment Funding
Pros
Good spread
Cons
Slow customer support & Not intuitive dashbaord

Active Deals & Promo Codes

DNA Funded
25% OFF 25% off all challenge accounts
Ment Funding

No active deals

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better, DNA Funded or Ment Funding?

Ment Funding scores higher overall, winning 4 out of 6 comparison categories including Overall Rating, TrustPilot, Safety Grade. However, the best choice depends on your trading goals and priorities.

Which is cheaper, DNA Funded or Ment Funding?

DNA Funded has the lower starting price at $49. DNA Funded offers 18 challenge options starting from $49, while Ment Funding offers 6 options starting from $250.

Which has better reviews, DNA Funded or Ment Funding?

Ment Funding has a higher TrustPilot rating of 4.9/5. DNA Funded has 88 reviews while Ment Funding has 227.

Which offers a higher profit split, DNA Funded or Ment Funding?

DNA Funded offers a higher maximum profit split. DNA Funded offers Up to 90% (80% default, upgradeable to 90% with add-on) while Ment Funding offers 75% (up to 90%).

How fast do DNA Funded and Ment Funding pay out?

DNA Funded has First payout after 14 days (7 days with add-on) payouts while Ment Funding offers On demand payouts. Payout speed can be an important factor when choosing a prop firm.