Skip to main content

Shark Futures

6.5 B
Lithuania Futures
VS

Lucid Trading

7.8 B+
United States Futures
Key Differences
Safety B vs B+ Split 90% vs 100%

Verdict: Who Wins?

Shark Futures 1 wins
1 5
Lucid Trading 5 wins Our Pick
Overall Rating 7.8 vs 6.5
TrustPilot 4.7 vs 4.6
Profit Split 100% first $10K, then 90/10 vs 90%
Safety Grade B+ vs B
Challenge Variety 8 vs 4 options
Platform Choice 5 vs 3 platforms

Best For:

Maximum profit potential Lucid Trading
Trust & reputation Lucid Trading

Visual Comparison

Shark Futures Lucid Trading

Head-to-Head Comparison

Shark Futures Metric Lucid Trading
6.5/10 PFM Score 7.8/10
4.6/5 (24) TrustPilot 4.7/5 (3,645)
B Safety Grade B+
90% Profit Split 100% first $10K, then 90/10
Basic: None (Trailing Max DD only). Instant PRO $25K: None. Instant PRO $50K-$150K & PRO: Daily Loss Limit (soft breach) equal to Trailing Max DD on PRO; $1,500/$3,000/$4,500 on Instant PRO 50K/100K/150K. Daily Drawdown EOD trailing on $25K (no DLL); DLL applies on $50K ($1,200), $100K ($1,800), $150K ($2,700)
On-demand (no daily limit; processed within 24h) Payout Frequency Daily
$59 Starting Price $
Proprietary Technology White-Label
Quantower, Atas, Volumetrica Platforms NinjaTrader, Tradovate, Quantower, MotiveWave, Rithmic
No Direct Path to Funded No
Lithuania Country United States
Feb 2026 Established Jan 2025
8 options Challenge Options 4 options

Shark Futures vs Lucid Trading: Detailed Analysis

Shark Futures and Lucid Trading are both Futures firms. Lucid Trading has been in business longer, established in 2025, while Shark Futures was founded in 2026.

Shark Futures offers 90% profit split, while Lucid Trading offers 100% first $10K, then 90/10. Shark Futures pays out On-demand (no daily limit; processed within 24h), and Lucid Trading pays out Daily.

For trust and reputation, Shark Futures has a 4.6/5 TrustPilot rating with 24 reviews, while Lucid Trading has 4.7/5 with 3,645 reviews. Safety grades: Shark Futures B, Lucid Trading B+.

Overall, Lucid Trading edges ahead winning 5 out of 6 categories we compared. However, the best choice depends on your specific needs — both firms have their strengths.

Pros & Cons

Shark Futures
Pros
One-phase evaluation, $0 activation fee on Basic, 90/10 profit split, on-demand payouts via Rise, EOD trailing drawdown, no consistency on the Basic challenge funded side as low as 35% ($25K), scaling path to $750K live capital, Volumetrica/Quantower/ATAS supported.
Cons
Brand-new firm (registered Feb 2026, launched April 2026); only 24 TrustPilot reviews; trailing max drawdown locks at starting balance (never above); 50% consistency on Basic eval (evaluation only); 6-day minimum to payout on PRO, 8-day minimum on Instant PRO; Mac users limited (Volumetrica/ATAS Windows-based, Deepchart web-based only).
Lucid Trading
Pros
Real-time activations (5-30 min), no activation fees, one-time fee no monthly subscription, EOD drawdowns, 10:1 micro scaling, 90/10 profit split (100% first $10K), no payout windows, transition to LucidLive real-capital account, daily withdrawals on LucidLive, large active Discord community (58K members)
Cons
New firm (founded 2025), reset fees required after failed evals, max 5 funded accounts per household

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better, Shark Futures or Lucid Trading?

Lucid Trading scores higher overall, winning 5 out of 6 comparison categories including Overall Rating, TrustPilot, Profit Split. However, the best choice depends on your trading goals and priorities.

Which has better reviews, Shark Futures or Lucid Trading?

Lucid Trading has a higher TrustPilot rating of 4.7/5. Shark Futures has 24 reviews while Lucid Trading has 3,645.

Which offers a higher profit split, Shark Futures or Lucid Trading?

Lucid Trading offers a higher maximum profit split. Shark Futures offers 90% while Lucid Trading offers 100% first $10K, then 90/10.

How fast do Shark Futures and Lucid Trading pay out?

Shark Futures has On-demand (no daily limit; processed within 24h) payouts while Lucid Trading offers Daily payouts. Payout speed can be an important factor when choosing a prop firm.