Skip to main content

Funding Traders

2.3 B
Hong Kong CFD
VS

Ment Funding

3.0 B+
United States CFD

Verdict: Who Wins?

Funding Traders 3 wins
3 4
Ment Funding 4 wins
Overall Rating 3.0 vs 2.3
TrustPilot 4.9 vs 3.5
Starting Price $39 vs $250
Profit Split 80-100% vs 75% (up to 90%)
Safety Grade B+ vs B
Challenge Variety 24 vs 6 options
Platform Choice 5 vs 2 platforms

Best For:

Budget-conscious traders Funding Traders
Maximum profit potential Funding Traders
Trust & reputation Ment Funding
Fast payouts Ment Funding

Visual Comparison

Funding Traders Ment Funding

Head-to-Head Comparison

Funding Traders Metric Ment Funding
2.3/10 PFM Score 3.0/10
3.5/5 (3,259) Suspended TrustPilot 4.9/5 (227)
B Safety Grade B+
80-100% Profit Split 75% (up to 90%)
3-5% daily / 6-10% max (varies by plan) Daily Drawdown 3% daily (futures) / 5% daily (CFD) / 6% max static
Every 14-21 Days Payout Frequency On demand
$39 Starting Price $250
Proprietary Technology White-Label
MT5, TradeLocker Platforms DXTrade, cTrader, Match Trader, MT5, MT4
No Direct Path to Funded No
Hong Kong Country United States
Apr 2023 Established Oct 2021
24 options Challenge Options 6 options

Price Comparison by Account Size

Cheapest challenge price at each account size (where both firms offer the same size)

Account Size Funding Traders Ment Funding Savings
$25K $119 $250 Save $131
$50K $229 $450 Save $221
$100K $419 $750 Save $331
$200K $799 $1,500 Save $701
$400K $2,349 $3,000 Save $651

Funding Traders vs Ment Funding: Detailed Analysis

Funding Traders and Ment Funding are both CFD firms. Ment Funding has been in business longer, established in 2021, while Funding Traders was founded in 2023.

In terms of pricing, Funding Traders is more affordable with challenges starting at $39, which is $211 less than Ment Funding's starting price of $250. Funding Traders offers 24 challenge options, while Ment Funding offers 6.

Funding Traders offers 80-100% profit split, while Ment Funding offers 75% (up to 90%). Funding Traders pays out Every 14-21 Days, and Ment Funding pays out On demand.

For trust and reputation, Funding Traders has a 3.5/5 TrustPilot rating with 3,259 reviews (currently suspended), while Ment Funding has 4.9/5 with 227 reviews. Safety grades: Funding Traders B, Ment Funding B+.

This is a close matchup with Funding Traders winning 3 and Ment Funding winning 4 of the categories we compared. The right choice depends on what matters most to you as a trader.

Pros & Cons

Funding Traders
Pros
Fast customer support & Rapid Execution of the trading platform
Cons
TrustPilot SUSPENDED for fake reviews (3,259 reviews, 21% 1-star). Payout delay complaints from traders. Legal entity RSRD Limited in Hong Kong. Some traders report disputed account closures.
Ment Funding
Pros
Good spread
Cons
Slow customer support & Not intuitive dashbaord

Active Deals & Promo Codes

Funding Traders
40% OFF 40% OFF + Pass and Get a FREE Account
50% OFF 50% off your first funded challenge
Ment Funding

No active deals

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better, Funding Traders or Ment Funding?

Both firms are competitive. Funding Traders wins in 3 categories while Ment Funding wins in 4. The best choice depends on what you prioritize: pricing, profit split, trust ratings, or payout speed.

Which is cheaper, Funding Traders or Ment Funding?

Funding Traders has the lower starting price at $39. Funding Traders offers 24 challenge options starting from $39, while Ment Funding offers 6 options starting from $250.

Which has better reviews, Funding Traders or Ment Funding?

Ment Funding has a higher TrustPilot rating of 4.9/5. Funding Traders has 3,259 reviews while Ment Funding has 227.

Which offers a higher profit split, Funding Traders or Ment Funding?

Funding Traders offers a higher maximum profit split. Funding Traders offers 80-100% while Ment Funding offers 75% (up to 90%).

How fast do Funding Traders and Ment Funding pay out?

Funding Traders has Every 14-21 Days payouts while Ment Funding offers On demand payouts. Payout speed can be an important factor when choosing a prop firm.