FX2 Funding vs Ment Funding: Head-to-Head Comparison (2026)
FX2 Funding
6.2 B
CFD
Ment Funding
7.2 A
CFD
Verdict: Who Wins?
FX2 Funding
1 wins
Ment Funding
7 wins
Decisive Win
Best For:
Ment Funding
FX2 Funding
Ment Funding
Visual Comparison
Head-to-Head Comparison
| FX2 Funding | Metric | Ment Funding |
|---|---|---|
| 6.2/10 | PFM Score | 7.2/10 ★ |
| 4.2/5 (454) | TrustPilot | 4.9/5 (231) ★ |
| B | Safety Grade | A ★ |
| 58.9 C | Trust Score | 78.3 B+ ★ |
| 80% (up to 95% with paid add-on at checkout) | Profit Split | 75% default (Forex, 90% with paid add-on); 80% flat (Equities); not stated (Futures) ★ |
| 4% daily (calculated -4% of higher of closed balance vs equity at 5pm EST); Max drawdown 10% static on 2-Step / 6% trailing on 1-Step / 6% fixed on 1-Step Pro & Instant | Daily Drawdown | 5% (Forex), 3% (Futures), 2% (Equities), balance-based, recalculated daily at 5PM EST |
| Every 14 days from first trade (every 5 days with paid add-on); processed within 48 hours | Payout Frequency | 14-day cycle |
| $465 | Starting Price | $220 ★ |
| White-Label | Technology | White-Label |
| DXTrade, cTrader, Match Trader, GooeyPro | Platforms | DXTrade, cTrader, Match Trader, Atas, Rithmic, GooeyPro |
| No | Direct Path to Funded | No |
| United States | Country | United States |
| Jan 2022 | Established | Jan 2021 |
| 1 option | Challenge Options | 17 options |
Price Comparison by Account Size
Cheapest challenge price at each account size (where both firms offer the same size)
| Account Size | FX2 Funding | Ment Funding | Savings |
|---|---|---|---|
| $50K | $465 | $450 ★ | Save $15 |
FX2 Funding vs Ment Funding: Detailed Analysis
FX2 Funding and Ment Funding are both CFD firms. Ment Funding has been in business longer, established in 2021, while FX2 Funding was founded in 2022.
Pricing
In terms of pricing, Ment Funding is more affordable with challenges starting at $220, which is $245 less than FX2 Funding's starting price of $465. FX2 Funding offers 1 challenge options, while Ment Funding offers 17.
Account Sizes
On account sizing, FX2 Funding offers a single $50 account, while Ment Funding offers account sizes from $1 to $400 across 9 funding tiers. Picking the right tier matters because both the entry cost and the maximum capital you can scale to are tied to the account size you start with.
Trading Platforms
For trading platforms, FX2 Funding supports DXTrade, cTrader, Match Trader and GooeyPro, while Ment Funding runs on DXTrade, cTrader, Match Trader, Atas, Rithmic and GooeyPro. If you already trade on a specific platform, this can be the deciding factor between the two.
Profit Split & Payouts
FX2 Funding offers 80% (up to 95% with paid add-on at checkout) profit split, while Ment Funding offers 75% default (Forex, 90% with paid add-on); 80% flat (Equities); not stated (Futures). FX2 Funding pays out Every 14 days from first trade (every 5 days with paid add-on); processed within 48 hours, and Ment Funding pays out 14-day cycle.
Risk & Drawdown Rules
Risk rules are a key difference for funded traders: FX2 Funding lists its daily drawdown as "4% daily (calculated -4% of higher of closed balance vs equity at 5pm EST); Max drawdown 10% static on 2-Step / 6% trailing on 1-Step / 6% fixed on 1-Step Pro & Instant", while Ment Funding lists "5% (Forex), 3% (Futures), 2% (Equities), balance-based, recalculated daily at 5PM EST". Always confirm the drawdown type before buying, since a trailing rule behaves very differently from a static end-of-day one.
Payout Methods
FX2 Funding supports withdrawals via Crypto.
Trust & Safety
For trust and reputation, FX2 Funding has a 4.2/5 TrustPilot rating with 454 reviews, while Ment Funding has 4.9/5 with 231 reviews. Safety grades: FX2 Funding B, Ment Funding A.
Who Should Choose Which
So who should pick which? FX2 Funding is the stronger choice for maximum profit potential, while Ment Funding is the better fit for budget-conscious traders and trust & reputation.
Overall, Ment Funding edges ahead winning 7 out of 8 categories we compared. However, the best choice depends on your specific needs - both firms have their strengths.
Pros & Cons
FX2 Funding
Pros
Cons
Ment Funding
Pros
Cons
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is better, FX2 Funding or Ment Funding?
Ment Funding scores higher overall, winning 7 out of 8 comparison categories including Overall Rating, TrustPilot, Starting Price. However, the best choice depends on your trading goals and priorities.
Which is cheaper, FX2 Funding or Ment Funding?
Ment Funding has the lower starting price at $220. FX2 Funding offers 1 challenge options starting from $465, while Ment Funding offers 17 options starting from $220.
Which has better reviews, FX2 Funding or Ment Funding?
Ment Funding has a higher TrustPilot rating of 4.9/5. FX2 Funding has 454 reviews while Ment Funding has 231.
Which offers a higher profit split, FX2 Funding or Ment Funding?
FX2 Funding offers a higher maximum profit split. FX2 Funding offers 80% (up to 95% with paid add-on at checkout) while Ment Funding offers 75% default (Forex, 90% with paid add-on); 80% flat (Equities); not stated (Futures).
How fast do FX2 Funding and Ment Funding pay out?
FX2 Funding has Every 14 days from first trade (every 5 days with paid add-on); processed within 48 hours payouts while Ment Funding offers 14-day cycle payouts. Payout speed can be an important factor when choosing a prop firm.
Are FX2 Funding and Ment Funding legit?
Both firms have been independently verified by PropFirmMap. FX2 Funding holds a B safety grade and a 4.2/5 TrustPilot rating. Ment Funding holds a A safety grade and a 4.9/5 TrustPilot rating. Safety grades are based on payout history, community trust signals, and regulatory transparency.
Which is better for beginners, FX2 Funding or Ment Funding?
Ment Funding may be more accessible for beginners due to its lower entry price. When starting out, consider challenge cost, drawdown rules, and profit split. Use the comparison table above to find which firm fits your experience level and risk tolerance.
More Comparisons
Not sold on either? Explore alternatives
See the closest-matched prop firms ranked head-to-head against each contender, with live 2026 prices and safety grades.