Tradexprop Review: Plans, Rules, and How It Compares
Tradexprop is a Malaysia-based proprietary trading firm that has operated under the Tradexprop brand since 2023. It sells simulated-account evaluations across two asset tracks, Forex/CFD and Crypto, plus an instant-funding product that skips the evaluation entirely. Entry pricing starts at $35 for a $5,000 two-step account, and the published lineup runs to a $400,000 Forex evaluation at $3,755. The firm advertises a headline profit split of up to 90%, static (balance-based) drawdowns on every evaluation, an instant first payout and bi-weekly payouts thereafter. Traders can choose between cTrader, MatchTrader and DXtrade. This review sets out what Tradexprop publishes on its own site, what its public review record currently shows, and how the numbers line up against three larger CFD firms we already track.
Plans and pricing
Tradexprop publishes 31 plan variants across five programs. The Forex/CFD evaluations carry a 45% consistency score and an infinite evaluation duration; the Crypto evaluations drop the consistency requirement and set minimum trading days at 0. All evaluation drawdowns are static, meaning they are measured against starting balance rather than trailing equity. Every price below is a one-time fee taken verbatim from the firm's pricing widget on 11 August 2026.
| Account size | X-1 Step Forex | X-2 Step Forex | X-1 Step Crypto | X-2 Step Crypto | Instant Funded X |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| $5,000 | $45 | $35 | $45 | $35 | $200 |
| $10,000 | $85 | $75 | $95 | $80 | $400 |
| $25,000 | $215 | $155 | $250 | $210 | $1,125 |
| $50,000 | $395 | $310 | $525 | $430 | $2,500 |
| $100,000 | $795 | $615 | $1,050 | $900 | $5,000 |
| $200,000 | Not offered | Not offered | $2,150 | $2,000 | Not offered |
| $250,000 | $2,155 | $1,540 | Not offered | Not offered | Not offered |
| $400,000 | $3,755 | $2,465 | Not offered | Not offered | Not offered |
The targets and loss limits differ by program rather than by account size. The one-step Forex evaluation asks for a 10% profit target against a 5% daily maximum loss and a 6% maximum static drawdown, at 50:1 leverage and an 80% profit split. The two-step Forex evaluation splits the target into 8% and then 5%, keeps the 5% daily maximum loss and widens the maximum static drawdown to 8%, also at 50:1 and 80%. The one-step Crypto evaluation asks for 9% against a daily cap of +/-3% and a 6% maximum static drawdown, at leverage of up to 5:1 and a 90% profit split. The two-step Crypto evaluation asks for 6% and then 9% against the same +/-3% daily cap with a 9% maximum static drawdown, again at up to 5:1 and 90%.
| Program | Profit target | Daily limit | Max static drawdown | Leverage | Profit split |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| X-1 Step Forex | 10% | 5% | 6% | 50:1 | 80% |
| X-2 Step Forex | 8% then 5% | 5% | 8% | 50:1 | 80% |
| X-1 Step Crypto | 9% | +/-3% cap | 6% | up to 5:1 | 90% |
| X-2 Step Crypto | 6% then 9% | +/-3% cap | 9% | up to 5:1 | 90% |
| Instant Funded X | None | 5% | 8% (trailing) | 50:1 | 80%/90% |
Rules that decide whether you pass
Three rules matter more than the price here. The first is the consistency score of 45% applied to the Forex and Crypto evaluations, which constrains how much of a total profit may come from a single day. The second is the drawdown type: every evaluation uses a static, balance-based drawdown, so the loss limit does not tighten behind a winning position the way a trailing drawdown does. The third applies only to the instant-funding product, which is the one program that uses a maximum trailing drawdown of 8% and which locks the account upon payout. The evaluations do not lock on payout.
Beyond those, Tradexprop states that no stop-loss is required, that weekend holding is allowed, that evaluation duration is infinite with no maximum trading days, and that minimum trading days are 0 on the one-step Crypto program. Expert advisors are permitted on the Instant Funded X accounts, which also carry a 30-day inactivity period and require positions to be flat for the weekend. Payouts are advertised as instant for the first withdrawal and bi-weekly thereafter, with a stated profit split of up to 90%.
The two-step Forex route at $35 for a $5,000 account is the cheapest way into the lineup, but the 90% profit split is attached to the Crypto programs, not the Forex ones, which pay 80%. Cheapest entry and highest split are two different products here.
What the public record shows
Tradexprop markets a 100% payout guarantee with zero denials since 2023, and states on its homepage that it has paid over $1,900,000+ to traders, with a largest single trader payout of $57,973 and more than 5K+ traders on the platform. Those figures are the firm's own published claims and we have no independent confirmation of them.
Its TrustPilot profile, checked on 11 August 2026, carries a 3.9 score across 44 reviews, of which 13 were left in the preceding 12 months. TrustPilot records that the firm has replied to 66% of negative reviews. The record is genuinely mixed and recent, so it is worth reading rather than averaging. A verified reviewer wrote on 27 January 2026: "Payout processed and received as promised by firm." Another, on 14 October 2025, wrote: "Trusted prop firm. Managed to get 2 payouts from them. Transparent and no hidden rules."
Payout processed and received as promised by firm.Verified TrustPilot reviewer, 27 January 2026
Against that, the two most recent reviews at the time of writing, dated 3 August 2026 and 10 August 2026, are both one-star and both allege that a payout was denied despite the firm's zero-denial marketing. Tradexprop replied publicly to the 3 August review, stating that the account in question had received multiple payouts previously, that its risk team found trading activity which mirrored or closely aligned with other accounts, and that this falls under the copy trading and reverse trading/group hedging sections of its terms. The firm also stated it will not disclose its detection methods. We are reporting the dispute, not adjudicating it: both accounts of events are public on the profile linked below.
The publicly disputed payouts on this profile turn on the copy trading and group hedging clauses rather than on drawdown breaches. Traders who copy signals, or who run correlated positions across several accounts, should read those clauses before funding an evaluation.
Pros and cons
Pros, all drawn from the firm's published plan data:
- Static, balance-based drawdown on every evaluation, rather than a trailing drawdown.
- No minimum trading days and infinite evaluation duration on the one-step programs, with no stop-loss requirement and weekend holding allowed.
- A dedicated Crypto-only evaluation track at a 90% profit split, which many CFD-focused firms do not publish at all.
Cons, drawn from the same data and the public review record:
- The 90% profit split applies to the Crypto programs; the Forex evaluations pay 80%, and Crypto leverage is capped at up to 5:1.
- A 45% consistency score applies to both Forex and Crypto evaluations, and the instant-funding accounts lock upon payout.
- A 3.9 TrustPilot score across only 44 reviews, including two one-star payout disputes in August 2026, is a thin and currently contested public record for a firm founded in 2023.
How it compares
Tradexprop's own homepage benchmarks the firm against FTMO and FundedNext, so those are two of the three comparisons below; we have added Funding Pips as the highest-scoring CFD firm in our database. All comparison figures come from our own firm records as of 11 August 2026.
| Firm | PropFirmMap Score | Profit split | TrustPilot | Lowest published fee |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tradexprop | 5.8 | Up to 90% | 3.9 (44) | $35 |
 Funding Pips | 8.9 | 80-100% | 4.5 (62,062) | $29 |
 FundedNext | 8.5 | Up to 95% | 4.5 (73,570) | $24.74 |
 FTMO | 8.3 | Up to 90% | 4.8 (42,594) | $79 |
The gap is not in the plan mechanics, which are competitive: a $35 entry fee undercuts FTMO's lowest published fee of $79, and the static drawdown and zero minimum trading days are more permissive than the four-day and five-day minimums Tradexprop's own comparison table attributes to FTMO and FundedNext respectively. The gap is in track record. Funding Pips, FundedNext and FTMO each carry TrustPilot scores of 4.5 or above across tens of thousands of reviews, while Tradexprop's 3.9 rests on 44. That difference is what drives its PropFirmMap Score of 5.8 and grade C against 8.3 to 8.9 for the three peers, because our score weights trust and reliability most heavily. Volume of evidence is the discriminator here, not the rulebook.
Verdict
Tradexprop publishes a coherent and unusually flexible rulebook: static drawdowns throughout, no minimum trading days on the one-step products, no stop-loss requirement, weekend holding, infinite duration, and a separate Crypto track at a 90% split that few CFD firms match. Entry at $35 is genuinely low. This suits traders who want a crypto-specific evaluation, who dislike trailing drawdowns, or who trade infrequently enough that minimum-day requirements are a real obstacle.
The counterweight is evidential rather than mechanical. A 3.9 score over 44 reviews, two of them unresolved public payout disputes from this month, is a small sample against peers with tens of thousands of reviews, and the firm's zero-denial claim is currently contested in public by named reviewers. Traders sizing a first purchase here should read the prohibited-strategy clauses in the terms, start small, and treat the payout process as the thing to verify personally before scaling up.
Sources, all checked 11 August 2026: plan pricing, targets, drawdowns, leverage, splits, platforms and the firm's payout and trader-count claims from tradexprop.com; rating, review count, reviewer quotes, the August 2026 payout disputes and the firm's public reply from the Tradexprop TrustPilot profile; comparison figures and PropFirmMap Scores from the PropFirmMap firm database.
Explore More
Related Articles
