Forge of Traders vs Ment Funding: Head-to-Head Comparison (2026)
Verdict: Who Wins?
Forge of Traders
2 wins
Best For:
Forge of Traders
Forge of Traders
Visual Comparison
Head-to-Head Comparison
| Forge of Traders | Metric | Ment Funding |
|---|---|---|
| - | PFM Score | 7.1/10 |
| 3.6/5 (49) | TrustPilot | 4.9/5 (231) ★ |
| - | Safety Grade | A ★ |
| 26.5 F | Trust Score | 78.3 B+ ★ |
| Up to 90% | Profit Split | 75% default (Forex, 90% with paid add-on); 80% flat (Equities); not stated (Futures) ★ |
| 5% daily drawdown based on End-of-Day (EOD) Balance, recalculated at 21:00 UTC each day (4% on some tiers); 10% static maximum drawdown anchored to the initial account balance (9% overall during the two-phase evaluation). Minimum 3 non-consecutive trading days per phase. No maximum time limit. | Daily Drawdown | 5% (Forex), 3% (Futures), 2% (Equities), balance-based, recalculated daily at 5PM EST |
| Bi-weekly | Payout Frequency | 14-day cycle |
| $26 ★ | Starting Price | $220 |
| White-Label | Technology | White-Label |
| DXTrade | Platforms | DXTrade, cTrader, Match Trader, Atas, Rithmic, GooeyPro |
| No | Direct Path to Funded | No |
| Cyprus | Country | United States |
| - | Established | Jan 2021 |
| 35 options | Challenge Options | 17 options |
Price Comparison by Account Size
Cheapest challenge price at each account size (where both firms offer the same size)
| Account Size | Forge of Traders | Ment Funding | Savings |
|---|---|---|---|
| $5K | $26 ★ | $220 | Save $194 |
| $10K | $45 ★ | $420 | Save $375 |
| $25K | $99 ★ | $250 | Save $151 |
| $50K | $189 ★ | $450 | Save $261 |
| $100K | $345 ★ | $750 | Save $405 |
| $200K | $675 ★ | $1,500 | Save $825 |
| $400K | $1,295 ★ | $3,000 | Save $1,705 |
Forge of Traders vs Ment Funding: Detailed Analysis
Forge of Traders and Ment Funding are both CFD firms.
Pricing
In terms of pricing, Forge of Traders is more affordable with challenges starting at $26, which is $194 less than Ment Funding's starting price of $220. Forge of Traders offers 35 challenge options, while Ment Funding offers 17.
Account Sizes
On account sizing, Forge of Traders offers account sizes from $1 to $500 across 12 funding tiers, while Ment Funding offers account sizes from $1 to $400 across 9 funding tiers. Picking the right tier matters because both the entry cost and the maximum capital you can scale to are tied to the account size you start with.
Trading Platforms
For trading platforms, Forge of Traders supports DXTrade, while Ment Funding runs on DXTrade, cTrader, Match Trader, Atas, Rithmic and GooeyPro. If you already trade on a specific platform, this can be the deciding factor between the two.
Profit Split & Payouts
Forge of Traders offers Up to 90% profit split, while Ment Funding offers 75% default (Forex, 90% with paid add-on); 80% flat (Equities); not stated (Futures). Forge of Traders pays out Bi-weekly, and Ment Funding pays out 14-day cycle.
Risk & Drawdown Rules
Risk rules are a key difference for funded traders: Forge of Traders lists its daily drawdown as "5% daily drawdown based on End-of-Day (EOD) Balance, recalculated at 21:00 UTC each day (4% on some tiers); 10% static maximum drawdown anchored to the initial account balance (9% overall during the two-phase evaluation). Minimum 3 non-consecutive trading days per phase. No maximum time limit.", while Ment Funding lists "5% (Forex), 3% (Futures), 2% (Equities), balance-based, recalculated daily at 5PM EST". Always confirm the drawdown type before buying, since a trailing rule behaves very differently from a static end-of-day one.
Payout Methods
Forge of Traders supports withdrawals via Crypto, PayPal and Wire Transfer.
Trust & Safety
For trust and reputation, Forge of Traders has a 3.6/5 TrustPilot rating with 49 reviews, while Ment Funding has 4.9/5 with 231 reviews.
Who Should Choose Which
So who should pick which? Forge of Traders is the stronger choice for budget-conscious traders and fast payouts, while Ment Funding is the better fit for trust & reputation.
Overall, Ment Funding edges ahead winning 5 out of 7 categories we compared. However, the best choice depends on your specific needs - both firms have their strengths.
Pros & Cons
Forge of Traders
Pros
Cons
Pros
Cons
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is better, Forge of Traders or Ment Funding?
Ment Funding scores higher overall, winning 5 out of 7 comparison categories including Overall Rating, TrustPilot, Safety Grade. However, the best choice depends on your trading goals and priorities.
Which is cheaper, Forge of Traders or Ment Funding?
Forge of Traders has the lower starting price at $26. Forge of Traders offers 35 challenge options starting from $26, while Ment Funding offers 17 options starting from $220.
Which has better reviews, Forge of Traders or Ment Funding?
Ment Funding has a higher TrustPilot rating of 4.9/5. Forge of Traders has 49 reviews while Ment Funding has 231.
Which offers a higher profit split, Forge of Traders or Ment Funding?
Forge of Traders offers a higher maximum profit split. Forge of Traders offers Up to 90% while Ment Funding offers 75% default (Forex, 90% with paid add-on); 80% flat (Equities); not stated (Futures).
How fast do Forge of Traders and Ment Funding pay out?
Forge of Traders has Bi-weekly payouts while Ment Funding offers 14-day cycle payouts. Payout speed can be an important factor when choosing a prop firm.
Are Forge of Traders and Ment Funding legit?
Both firms have been independently verified by PropFirmMap. Forge of Traders holds a unrated safety grade and a 3.6/5 TrustPilot rating. Ment Funding holds a A safety grade and a 4.9/5 TrustPilot rating. Safety grades are based on payout history, community trust signals, and regulatory transparency.
Which is better for beginners, Forge of Traders or Ment Funding?
Forge of Traders may be more accessible for beginners due to its lower entry price. When starting out, consider challenge cost, drawdown rules, and profit split. Use the comparison table above to find which firm fits your experience level and risk tolerance.
More Comparisons
Not sold on either? Explore alternatives
See the closest-matched prop firms ranked head-to-head against each contender, with live 2026 prices and safety grades.