Skip to main content

For Traders

2.5 B
United Arab Emirates CFD
VS

Funding Pips

2.9 A+
United Arab Emirates CFD

Verdict: Who Wins?

For Traders 2 wins
2 5
Funding Pips 5 wins Our Pick
Overall Rating 2.9 vs 2.5
TrustPilot 4.5 vs 4
Starting Price $23 vs $29
Profit Split 60-100% vs 80% (up to 90%)
Safety Grade A+ vs B
Challenge Variety 25 vs 20 options
Platform Choice 4 vs 2 platforms

Best For:

Budget-conscious traders For Traders
Maximum profit potential Funding Pips
Trust & reputation Funding Pips
Fast payouts Funding Pips

Visual Comparison

For Traders Funding Pips

Head-to-Head Comparison

For Traders Metric Funding Pips
2.5/10 PFM Score 2.9/10
4/5 (1,667) Suspended TrustPilot 4.5/5 (52,198)
B Safety Grade A+
80% (up to 90%) Profit Split 60-100%
Varies by plan (see challenge rules) Daily Drawdown Varies: 3-5% daily, 5-10% max
Bi-weekly Payout Frequency Weekly (Tuesday)
$23 Starting Price $29
White-Label Technology Proprietary
cTrader, TradeLocker Platforms cTrader, Match Trader, MT5, TradeLocker
No Direct Path to Funded No
United Arab Emirates Country United Arab Emirates
Jul 2023 Established Jan 2022
25 options Challenge Options 20 options

Price Comparison by Account Size

Cheapest challenge price at each account size (where both firms offer the same size)

Account Size For Traders Funding Pips Savings
$25K $149 $109 Save $40
$50K $235 $219 Save $16
$100K $349 $399 Save $50

For Traders vs Funding Pips: Detailed Analysis

For Traders and Funding Pips are both CFD firms. Funding Pips has been in business longer, established in 2022, while For Traders was founded in 2023.

In terms of pricing, For Traders is more affordable with challenges starting at $23, which is $6 less than Funding Pips's starting price of $29. For Traders offers 25 challenge options, while Funding Pips offers 20.

For Traders offers 80% (up to 90%) profit split, while Funding Pips offers 60-100%. For Traders pays out Bi-weekly, and Funding Pips pays out Weekly (Tuesday).

For trust and reputation, For Traders has a 4/5 TrustPilot rating with 1,667 reviews (currently suspended), while Funding Pips has 4.5/5 with 52,198 reviews. Safety grades: For Traders B, Funding Pips A+.

Overall, Funding Pips edges ahead winning 5 out of 7 categories we compared. However, the best choice depends on your specific needs — both firms have their strengths.

Pros & Cons

For Traders
Pros
Fast customer cuspport
Cons
TrustPilot SUSPENDED for fake reviews (1,664 reviews removed). Currently migrating to new broker (purchases temporarily unavailable). Dual entity structure (Saint Lucia + Dubai). High leverage 1:125 on forex.
Funding Pips
Pros
Lots of payment methods & Platforms. Well made payout rules
Cons
A splippage sometimes higher than it should be

Active Deals & Promo Codes

For Traders
30% OFF 30% off all challenges - Easter 2026
20% OFF 20% off all challenges - New user discount
15% OFF 15% off all challenges
30% OFF 30% off + Buy One Get One Free challenge
Funding Pips
20% OFF 20% off first challenge
20% OFF 20% off all challenges
25% OFF 25% off all challenges

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better, For Traders or Funding Pips?

Funding Pips scores higher overall, winning 5 out of 7 comparison categories including Overall Rating, TrustPilot, Profit Split. However, the best choice depends on your trading goals and priorities.

Which is cheaper, For Traders or Funding Pips?

For Traders has the lower starting price at $23. For Traders offers 25 challenge options starting from $23, while Funding Pips offers 20 options starting from $29.

Which has better reviews, For Traders or Funding Pips?

Funding Pips has a higher TrustPilot rating of 4.5/5. For Traders has 1,667 reviews while Funding Pips has 52,198.

Which offers a higher profit split, For Traders or Funding Pips?

Funding Pips offers a higher maximum profit split. For Traders offers 80% (up to 90%) while Funding Pips offers 60-100%.

How fast do For Traders and Funding Pips pay out?

For Traders has Bi-weekly payouts while Funding Pips offers Weekly (Tuesday) payouts. Payout speed can be an important factor when choosing a prop firm.