LegionFunding Review 2026: Plans, Rules, Payouts and How It Compares
LegionFunding
LegionFunding is a CFD prop firm trading as the brand of Hyper Funded Ltd., a company incorporated in Saint Lucia under registration number 2026-00324. It sells simulated proprietary trading evaluations on MetaTrader 5 and publishes its full rule set on a dedicated Trading Objectives page rather than only inside its terms. The firm does not publish a founding date anywhere on its site, help centre or TrustPilot profile, so we record that field as unknown rather than estimate it. What is unusual about the lineup is its width: four separate evaluation models are sold side by side at five account sizes each, so the entry price runs from $9 to $699 and a trader picks a route rather than a single funnel. Every model pays the same 80% profit split, with no scaling requirement attached to reach it.
Plans and pricing
All four models are offered at $5K, $10K, $25K, $50K and $100K. The table below gives the price range across those five sizes together with the objectives attached to each model, as published on the firm's Trading Objectives page and restated in its terms and conditions.
| Model | Price range | Profit target | Daily loss | Maximum loss | Minimum qualifying days |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2-Step | $35 to $529 | 8% then 5% | 4% | 10% | 3 per phase |
| 1-Step | $65 to $599 | 10% | 3% | 6% | 4 |
| Instant Funding | $69 to $699 | None, funded at activation | 3% | 5% trailing | Not applicable |
| Fast Track | $9 first fee | 6% | 3% | 5% | No minimum |
At the $50K size specifically, the 2-Step costs $339, the 1-Step $369 and Instant Funding $428. Fast Track is priced differently from the other three: the advertised $9 is a first fee only, and passing the 6% single-phase target triggers an activation fee that scales with account size at $50, $80, $170, $350 and $600 for the $5K through $100K accounts respectively. A trader reading only the $9 headline would be understating the cost of a funded Fast Track account by between $50 and $600.
Fast Track's $9 entry is a first fee, not the total cost. The activation fee of $50 to $600 falls due within 7 days of passing, so the real outlay at $100K is $609.
Rules summary
Drawdown is handled differently by model. The 2-Step uses a static 10% maximum loss, while the 1-Step (6%), Instant Funding (5%) and Fast Track (5%) all run trailing drawdown. Instant Funding adds a 3% buffer to its trailing calculation and, along with Fast Track, applies a 20% consistency rule on the funded stage, meaning no single day may account for more than 20% of total profit. The 2-Step and 1-Step models carry no consistency rule at any stage.
Evaluations have no time limit, but an account may not sit inactive for more than 30 consecutive calendar days. Each qualifying trading day must realise at least 0.5% profit, which means a day of small or flat activity does not count toward the minimum. Leverage is up to 1:50 during evaluation and drops to 1:30 on the funded stage of the 1-Step and Instant models. Maximum risk per symbol is 2% of the initial balance on the 2-Step and Instant models and 1% on the 1-Step.
Holding-time rules apply throughout: evaluation phases require a 2-minute average trade duration and funded accounts require a 1-minute minimum hold. On funded accounts only, no trade may be opened or closed within 5 minutes either side of a Forex Factory high-impact event, a 10-minute restricted window. The firm allows up to one soft breach. Expert Advisors are permitted as trade and risk management tools, but copy trading, cross-account hedging, high-frequency trading, latency and price-feed arbitrage, gap exploitation and tick scalping all trigger a breach.
Payouts are requested on demand once the funded-stage minimum of 5 qualifying trading days is met. The minimum request is $100, paid by bank transfer (UPI is named for bank payouts) or cryptocurrency in BTC, ETH or USDT. The evaluation fee is refunded at the fourth payout. Trading is explicitly simulated and rewards remain discretionary until approved. KYC runs through Sumsub. US residents are not eligible, alongside 12 further restricted countries.
Two conflicts are worth knowing before you buy. The homepage advertises "24hr Payouts", while section 19 of the terms and conditions and the help centre both state requests are reviewed within 1 to 3 business days. Separately, the homepage FAQ gives an 8% maximum drawdown on the 2-Step and a "5-8%" range overall, where the Trading Objectives page and terms sections 8.1 to 8.4 both state 10% on the 2-Step. We publish the figures from the binding documents in each case.
Pros
- The full rule set for all four models is published openly on a dedicated page and restated in the terms, rather than being distributed across a help centre only.
- The 80% profit split is flat across every model and size, with no scaling requirement or paid add-on attached to reach it.
- Four models at five sizes each gives a $9 to $699 entry range, so the same firm covers both a low first outlay and a no-evaluation route.
Cons
- The operator is a Saint Lucia company with no financial regulator, no published founding date and no named team.
- Fast Track's advertised $9 excludes an activation fee of $50 to $600 that falls due on passing.
- The TrustPilot score of 4.3 rests on only 50 reviews, a small sample compared with the established firms in the same price bracket.
How it compares
Measured at the $50K two-step account, the size and model most directly comparable across firms, LegionFunding sits inside the normal price band for CFD firms on PropFirmMap. The figures below are as recorded on each firm's page.
| Firm | $50K 2-step price | Profit split | Phase targets | Daily loss | Maximum loss |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LegionFunding | $339 | 80% | 8% then 5% | 4% | 10% |
| FTMO | $345 | Up to 90% | 10% then 5% | 5% | 10% |
| The5ers | $309 | 80% to 100% | 8% then 5% | 5% | 10% |
| Funding Pips | $289 | 60% to 100% | 8% then 5% | 5% | 10% |
Three things stand out from that row. First, price is not the differentiator: $339 sits between Funding Pips at $289 and FTMO at $345, so all four firms fall inside one narrow band. Second, LegionFunding's phase targets match The5ers and Funding Pips exactly at 8% then 5%, and its 10% maximum loss matches all three comparators, so the evaluation difficulty is conventional rather than unusual in either direction. Third, the one figure that is genuinely tighter is the daily loss limit: 4% against 5% at all three comparators. That is 1% less room per day on the same maximum loss, which matters most to traders who take size early in a session.
On profit split the comparison needs care, because the firms are not stating the same kind of number. LegionFunding's 80% is a flat rate that applies from the first payout with no condition attached. FTMO's "up to 90%", The5ers' "80% to 100%" and Funding Pips' "60% to 100%" are ranges whose upper end is reached through scaling or programme conditions, and whose lower end can sit below 80%. A trader comparing headline percentages alone would draw the wrong conclusion about the first payout on a fresh account.
The clearer gap is track record. FTMO carries a 4.8 TrustPilot rating from 50,724 reviews, Funding Pips 4.5 from 67,250 and The5ers 4.7 from 36,395. LegionFunding's 4.3 comes from 50 reviews. The rating is comparable; the evidence base behind it is 50 reviews against 50,724, and it is a 2026-vintage brand with no trading history through a full market cycle.
Verdict
LegionFunding is a conventionally priced CFD firm whose main distinguishing feature is breadth of route rather than any single term. The 80% split is flat and unconditional where several comparators publish ranges, and the published rule set is more complete than many firms of similar age. Against that, the operator is unregulated, undated and unnamed, the sample behind its rating is small, and its own marketing contradicts its binding documents in two measurable places.
It suits traders who want a fixed, unconditional split from the first payout rather than a scaling ladder, who can work inside a 4% daily loss limit, and who specifically want either a no-evaluation route or a low first outlay. It suits less well a trader who needs a regulated counterparty, a long verifiable payout history, or who intends to take Fast Track at face value without budgeting for the activation fee. As with any firm carrying a short history, position sizing against the possibility of non-payment is a separate question from whether the rules themselves are workable.
Sources checked for this review: legionfunding.com/trading-objectives, the terms and conditions, the firm's homepage and about page, its help centre articles on payouts, profit split and platforms, and its TrustPilot profile. Pricing and objectives were re-verified live against all four model tabs on 2026-08-31. Figures for comparator firms are as recorded on their PropFirmMap pages.
Explore More
Related Articles
