Skip to main content

Funding Pips vs SiegPath: Head-to-Head Comparison (2026)

Funding Pips

8.9 A+
United Arab Emirates CFD
VS
Key Differences
Split 100% vs 90% Price $29 vs $55

Verdict: Who Wins?

Funding Pips 8 wins Decisive Win
8 - 0
SiegPath 0 wins
Overall Rating 8.9 vs 0.0 Decisive
TrustPilot 4.5 vs 4 Clear
Starting Price $29 vs $55 Decisive
Profit Split 60-100% vs 80%-90% on 1 Step Express, 2 Step Standard and 2 Step Flex; 50%-90% on the 10K Flash Challenge Decisive
Safety Grade A+ vs Decisive
Trust Score 94.3/100 vs 36/100 Decisive
Challenge Variety 27 vs 16 options Decisive
Platform Choice 3 vs 1 platforms Narrow

Best For:

Budget-conscious traders Funding Pips
Maximum profit potential Funding Pips
Trust & reputation Funding Pips
Fast payouts Funding Pips

Visual Comparison

Funding Pips SiegPath

Save 25% on Funding Pips today

from $29
Save 25% Now Code re-checked 24 Aug 2026

Head-to-Head Comparison

Funding Pips Metric SiegPath
8.9/10 PFM Score -
4.5/5 (67,684) TrustPilot 4/5 (16)
A+ Safety Grade -
94.3 A+ Trust Score 36 F
60-100% Profit Split 80%-90% on 1 Step Express, 2 Step Standard and 2 Step Flex; 50%-90% on the 10K Flash Challenge
3% (Zero/1-Step Flex/2-Step Pro), 4% (2-Step Flex), 5% (2-Step Standard) Daily Drawdown 3% on 1 Step Express, 5% on 2 Step Standard and 2 Step Flex, and 2.5% on the 10K Flash Challenge
Weekly Payout Frequency Every 14 days
$29 Starting Price $55
Proprietary Technology Proprietary
cTrader, Match Trader, MT5 Platforms Sieg Terminal
No Direct Path to Funded No
United Arab Emirates Country Hong Kong
Oct 2022 Established -
27 options Challenge Options 16 options

Price Comparison by Account Size

Cheapest challenge price at each account size (where both firms offer the same size)

Account Size Funding Pips SiegPath Savings
$5K $29 $55 Save $26
$10K $55 $95 Save $40
$50K $224 $290 Save $66
$100K $422 $570 Save $148

Funding Pips vs SiegPath: Detailed Analysis

Funding Pips and SiegPath are both CFD firms.

Pricing

In terms of pricing, Funding Pips is more affordable with challenges starting at $29, which is $26 less than SiegPath's starting price of $55. Funding Pips offers 27 challenge options, while SiegPath offers 16.

Account Sizes

On account sizing, Funding Pips offers account sizes from $5 to $200 across 6 funding tiers, while SiegPath offers account sizes from $5 to $100 across 5 funding tiers. Picking the right tier matters because both the entry cost and the maximum capital you can scale to are tied to the account size you start with.

Trading Platforms

For trading platforms, Funding Pips supports cTrader, Match Trader and MT5, while SiegPath runs on Sieg Terminal. If you already trade on a specific platform, this can be the deciding factor between the two.

Profit Split & Payouts

Funding Pips offers 60-100% profit split, while SiegPath offers 80%-90% on 1 Step Express, 2 Step Standard and 2 Step Flex; 50%-90% on the 10K Flash Challenge. Funding Pips pays out Weekly, and SiegPath pays out Every 14 days.

Risk & Drawdown Rules

Risk rules are a key difference for funded traders: Funding Pips lists its daily drawdown as "3% (Zero/1-Step Flex/2-Step Pro), 4% (2-Step Flex), 5% (2-Step Standard)", while SiegPath lists "3% on 1 Step Express, 5% on 2 Step Standard and 2 Step Flex, and 2.5% on the 10K Flash Challenge". Always confirm the drawdown type before buying, since a trailing rule behaves very differently from a static end-of-day one.

Payout Methods

Funding Pips supports withdrawals via Rise, Crypto and Wire Transfer.

Trust & Safety

For trust and reputation, Funding Pips has a 4.5/5 TrustPilot rating with 67,684 reviews, while SiegPath has 4/5 with 16 reviews.

Who Should Choose Which

Across the use cases we scored, Funding Pips is the stronger choice for budget-conscious traders, maximum profit potential, trust & reputation and fast payouts.

Overall, Funding Pips edges ahead winning 8 out of 8 categories we compared. However, the best choice depends on your specific needs - both firms have their strengths.

Pros & Cons

Funding Pips
Pros
Up to 100% profit split with flexible reward cycles (weekly, bi-weekly, monthly, daily, on-demand). Starting from $29. Zero reward denial policy. Multiple evaluation models including 1-Step, 2-Step Standard, and Zero instant funding. Scale to $2M in prime capital. Over $263M distributed to 3M+ traders worldwide.
Cons
News trading restricted on funded/master accounts (5-minute window). Weekend holding not permitted on master accounts (positions auto-closed Friday). HFT, tick scalping, hedging, and latency arbitrage prohibited. Consistency score soft rule on funded accounts may delay rewards.
SiegPath
Pros
Four evaluation routes - 1 Step Express, 2 Step Standard, 2 Step Flex and a 30-day 10K Flash Challenge - priced from $55 and sold in five simulated account sizes from $5K to $100K. Generous evaluation windows of 180 days per phase (30 days on the Flash Challenge) rather than the 30-day limits common elsewhere. News trading and high-frequency trading are both explicitly allowed, and the 2 Step Flex route permits weekend position holding. The evaluation fee is refunded once per account size to traders who pass 1 Step Express, 2 Step Standard or 2 Step Flex, and SiegPath charges no per-lot commission on order placement. Payout share runs 80%-90% and rewards are paid by the partner private fund Framsteg Ltd, with withdrawals every 14 days from a $100 minimum.
Cons
SiegPath is an evaluation and certification service, not a broker: the operating entity Sieg Evaluation Limited is a Hong Kong company (No. 77606483) holding no financial-services licence, all trading is simulated, and fees are explicitly non-refundable service fees except where a passing trader qualifies for the fee refund. The firm's own Programme Rules PDF advertises $200K and $400K account tiers, but neither size can be purchased: the checkout's account-size selector stops at $100,000 and all six $200K/$400K plan links silently fall back to the $5,000 default plan. Trading is confined to the firm's proprietary Sieg Terminal platform through a single broker, KCM Trade, with no MetaTrader or cTrader option. Hedging, group trading and holding two or more accounts trading the same product are all prohibited and can void an account, weekend holding is limited to the 2 Step Flex route, margin usage is capped at 75% of real-time equity, and a stop loss is mandatory on the largest tiers. TrustPilot carries only 16 reviews, a thin base for a firm trading since 2016.

Active Deals & Promo Codes

Funding Pips
20% OFF 20% off first challenge
20% OFF 20% off all challenges
25% OFF 25% off all challenges
SiegPath

No active deals

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better, Funding Pips or SiegPath?

Funding Pips scores higher overall, winning 8 out of 8 comparison categories including Overall Rating, TrustPilot, Starting Price. However, the best choice depends on your trading goals and priorities.

Which is cheaper, Funding Pips or SiegPath?

Funding Pips has the lower starting price at $29. Funding Pips offers 27 challenge options starting from $29, while SiegPath offers 16 options starting from $55.

Which has better reviews, Funding Pips or SiegPath?

Funding Pips has a higher TrustPilot rating of 4.5/5. Funding Pips has 67,684 reviews while SiegPath has 16.

Which offers a higher profit split, Funding Pips or SiegPath?

Funding Pips offers a higher maximum profit split. Funding Pips offers 60-100% while SiegPath offers 80%-90% on 1 Step Express, 2 Step Standard and 2 Step Flex; 50%-90% on the 10K Flash Challenge.

How fast do Funding Pips and SiegPath pay out?

Funding Pips has Weekly payouts while SiegPath offers Every 14 days payouts. Payout speed can be an important factor when choosing a prop firm.

Are Funding Pips and SiegPath legit?

Both firms have been independently verified by PropFirmMap. Funding Pips holds a A+ safety grade and a 4.5/5 TrustPilot rating. SiegPath holds a unrated safety grade and a 4/5 TrustPilot rating. Safety grades are based on payout history, community trust signals, and regulatory transparency.

Which is better for beginners, Funding Pips or SiegPath?

Funding Pips may be more accessible for beginners due to its lower entry price. When starting out, consider challenge cost, drawdown rules, and profit split. Use the comparison table above to find which firm fits your experience level and risk tolerance.

Not sold on either? Explore alternatives

See the closest-matched prop firms ranked head-to-head against each contender, with live 2026 prices and safety grades.