FX2 Funding vs Quant Tekel (Ascendx): Head-to-Head Comparison (2026)
Verdict: Who Wins?
Best For:
Visual Comparison
Save 50% on Quant Tekel (Ascendx) today
Head-to-Head Comparison
| FX2 Funding | Metric | Quant Tekel (Ascendx) |
|---|---|---|
| 6.1/10 | PFM Score | 7.9/10 ★ |
| 4.2/5 (454) ★ | TrustPilot | 3.8/5 (13,049) |
| B | Safety Grade | B+ ★ |
| 59.3 C | Trust Score | 71.7 B+ ★ |
| 80% (up to 95% with paid add-on at checkout) ★ | Profit Split | 80% (up to 90%) |
| 4% daily (calculated -4% of higher of closed balance vs equity at 5pm EST); Max drawdown 10% static on 2-Step / 6% trailing on 1-Step / 6% fixed on 1-Step Pro & Instant | Daily Drawdown | 3-4% daily, 6-10% max (varies by program) |
| Every 14 days from first trade (every 5 days with paid add-on); processed within 48 hours | Payout Frequency | 14 Days (2 Step / 2 Step Elite), Bi-weekly (Pay When Funded 1 Step), On-Demand (Power) |
| $465 | Starting Price | $10 ★ |
| White-Label | Technology | White-Label |
| DXTrade, cTrader, Match Trader, GooeyPro | Platforms | MT5, TradeLocker |
| No | Direct Path to Funded | No |
| United States | Country | South Africa |
| Jan 2022 | Established | Oct 2023 |
| 1 option | Challenge Options | 26 options |
Price Comparison by Account Size
Cheapest challenge price at each account size (where both firms offer the same size)
| Account Size | FX2 Funding | Quant Tekel (Ascendx) | Savings |
|---|---|---|---|
| $50K | $465 | $25 ★ | Save $440 |
FX2 Funding vs Quant Tekel (Ascendx): Detailed Analysis
FX2 Funding and Quant Tekel (Ascendx) are both CFD firms. FX2 Funding has been in business longer, established in 2022, while Quant Tekel (Ascendx) was founded in 2023.
Pricing
In terms of pricing, Quant Tekel (Ascendx) is more affordable with challenges starting at $10, which is $455 less than FX2 Funding's starting price of $465. FX2 Funding offers 1 challenge options, while Quant Tekel (Ascendx) offers 26.
Account Sizes
On account sizing, FX2 Funding offers a single $50 account, while Quant Tekel (Ascendx) offers account sizes from $5 to $200 across 6 funding tiers. Picking the right tier matters because both the entry cost and the maximum capital you can scale to are tied to the account size you start with.
Trading Platforms
For trading platforms, FX2 Funding supports DXTrade, cTrader, Match Trader and GooeyPro, while Quant Tekel (Ascendx) runs on MT5 and TradeLocker. If you already trade on a specific platform, this can be the deciding factor between the two.
Profit Split & Payouts
FX2 Funding offers 80% (up to 95% with paid add-on at checkout) profit split, while Quant Tekel (Ascendx) offers 80% (up to 90%). FX2 Funding pays out Every 14 days from first trade (every 5 days with paid add-on); processed within 48 hours, and Quant Tekel (Ascendx) pays out 14 Days (2 Step / 2 Step Elite), Bi-weekly (Pay When Funded 1 Step), On-Demand (Power).
Risk & Drawdown Rules
Risk rules are a key difference for funded traders: FX2 Funding lists its daily drawdown as "4% daily (calculated -4% of higher of closed balance vs equity at 5pm EST); Max drawdown 10% static on 2-Step / 6% trailing on 1-Step / 6% fixed on 1-Step Pro & Instant", while Quant Tekel (Ascendx) lists "3-4% daily, 6-10% max (varies by program)". Always confirm the drawdown type before buying, since a trailing rule behaves very differently from a static end-of-day one.
Payout Methods
FX2 Funding supports withdrawals via Crypto.
Trust & Safety
For trust and reputation, FX2 Funding has a 4.2/5 TrustPilot rating with 454 reviews, while Quant Tekel (Ascendx) has 3.8/5 with 13,049 reviews. Safety grades: FX2 Funding B, Quant Tekel (Ascendx) B+.
Who Should Choose Which
So who should pick which? FX2 Funding is the stronger choice for maximum profit potential, while Quant Tekel (Ascendx) is the better fit for budget-conscious traders, trust & reputation and fast payouts.
Overall, Quant Tekel (Ascendx) edges ahead winning 5 out of 8 categories we compared. However, the best choice depends on your specific needs - both firms have their strengths.
Pros & Cons
Pros
Cons
Pros
Cons
Active Deals & Promo Codes
No active deals
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is better, FX2 Funding or Quant Tekel (Ascendx)?
Quant Tekel (Ascendx) scores higher overall, winning 5 out of 8 comparison categories including Overall Rating, Starting Price, Safety Grade. However, the best choice depends on your trading goals and priorities.
Which is cheaper, FX2 Funding or Quant Tekel (Ascendx)?
Quant Tekel (Ascendx) has the lower starting price at $10. FX2 Funding offers 1 challenge options starting from $465, while Quant Tekel (Ascendx) offers 26 options starting from $10.
Which has better reviews, FX2 Funding or Quant Tekel (Ascendx)?
FX2 Funding has a higher TrustPilot rating of 4.2/5. FX2 Funding has 454 reviews while Quant Tekel (Ascendx) has 13,049.
Which offers a higher profit split, FX2 Funding or Quant Tekel (Ascendx)?
FX2 Funding offers a higher maximum profit split. FX2 Funding offers 80% (up to 95% with paid add-on at checkout) while Quant Tekel (Ascendx) offers 80% (up to 90%).
How fast do FX2 Funding and Quant Tekel (Ascendx) pay out?
FX2 Funding has Every 14 days from first trade (every 5 days with paid add-on); processed within 48 hours payouts while Quant Tekel (Ascendx) offers 14 Days (2 Step / 2 Step Elite), Bi-weekly (Pay When Funded 1 Step), On-Demand (Power) payouts. Payout speed can be an important factor when choosing a prop firm.
Are FX2 Funding and Quant Tekel (Ascendx) legit?
Both firms have been independently verified by PropFirmMap. FX2 Funding holds a B safety grade and a 4.2/5 TrustPilot rating. Quant Tekel (Ascendx) holds a B+ safety grade and a 3.8/5 TrustPilot rating. Safety grades are based on payout history, community trust signals, and regulatory transparency.
Which is better for beginners, FX2 Funding or Quant Tekel (Ascendx)?
Quant Tekel (Ascendx) may be more accessible for beginners due to its lower entry price. When starting out, consider challenge cost, drawdown rules, and profit split. Use the comparison table above to find which firm fits your experience level and risk tolerance.
More Comparisons
Where these two rank in the wider market
A head-to-head answers "which of these two". These lists answer "is either one actually the best choice" - every firm we track, ranked side by side.
Browse every best-of prop firm listNot sold on either? Explore alternatives
See the closest-matched prop firms ranked head-to-head against each contender, with live 2026 prices and safety grades.