Imperial Trader Funding vs Ment Funding: Head-to-Head Comparison (2026)
Verdict: Who Wins?
Best For:
Visual Comparison
Head-to-Head Comparison
| Imperial Trader Funding | Metric | Ment Funding |
|---|---|---|
| 4.9/10 | PFM Score | 7.1/10 ★ |
| 3.3/5 (49) | TrustPilot | 4.8/5 (231) ★ |
| C | Safety Grade | A ★ |
| 42 D | Trust Score | 82.8 A ★ |
| 90% (Elite), 80% (Foundation and Instant) | Profit Split | 75% default (Forex, 90% with paid add-on); 80% flat (Equities); not stated (Futures) ★ |
| Elite: none, the plan card states Daily Loss Limit N/A. Foundation and Instant: 50% of the account's max drawdown. Drawdown is EOD trailing on Elite and Instant, Static on Foundation. | Daily Drawdown | 5% (Forex), 3% (Futures), 2% (Equities), balance-based, recalculated daily at 5PM EST |
| Every 3 valid trading days (Sim-Funded) | Payout Frequency | 14-day cycle |
| $122 ★ | Starting Price | $220 |
| Proprietary | Technology | White-Label |
| Rithmic | Platforms | DXTrade, cTrader, Match Trader, Atas, Rithmic, GooeyPro |
| No | Direct Path to Funded | No |
| United States | Country | United States |
| - | Established | Jan 2021 |
| 14 options | Challenge Options | 17 options |
Price Comparison by Account Size
Cheapest challenge price at each account size (where both firms offer the same size)
| Account Size | Imperial Trader Funding | Ment Funding | Savings |
|---|---|---|---|
| $1M | $2,274 ★ | $8,600 | Save $6,326 |
| $25K | $122 ★ | $250 | Save $128 |
| $50K | $230 ★ | $450 | Save $220 |
| $100K | $382 ★ | $750 | Save $368 |
Imperial Trader Funding vs Ment Funding: Detailed Analysis
Imperial Trader Funding and Ment Funding are both Stocks firms.
Pricing
In terms of pricing, Imperial Trader Funding is more affordable with challenges starting at $122, which is $98 less than Ment Funding's starting price of $220. Imperial Trader Funding offers 14 challenge options, while Ment Funding offers 17.
Account Sizes
On account sizing, Imperial Trader Funding offers account sizes from $1 to $500 across 8 funding tiers, while Ment Funding offers account sizes from $1 to $400 across 9 funding tiers. Picking the right tier matters because both the entry cost and the maximum capital you can scale to are tied to the account size you start with.
Trading Platforms
For trading platforms, Imperial Trader Funding supports Rithmic, while Ment Funding runs on DXTrade, cTrader, Match Trader, Atas, Rithmic and GooeyPro. If you already trade on a specific platform, this can be the deciding factor between the two.
Profit Split & Payouts
Imperial Trader Funding offers 90% (Elite), 80% (Foundation and Instant) profit split, while Ment Funding offers 75% default (Forex, 90% with paid add-on); 80% flat (Equities); not stated (Futures). Imperial Trader Funding pays out Every 3 valid trading days (Sim-Funded), and Ment Funding pays out 14-day cycle.
Risk & Drawdown Rules
Risk rules are a key difference for funded traders: Imperial Trader Funding lists its daily drawdown as "Elite: none, the plan card states Daily Loss Limit N/A. Foundation and Instant: 50% of the account's max drawdown. Drawdown is EOD trailing on Elite and Instant, Static on Foundation.", while Ment Funding lists "5% (Forex), 3% (Futures), 2% (Equities), balance-based, recalculated daily at 5PM EST". Always confirm the drawdown type before buying, since a trailing rule behaves very differently from a static end-of-day one.
Payout Methods
Imperial Trader Funding supports withdrawals via Rise and Wire Transfer.
Trust & Safety
For trust and reputation, Imperial Trader Funding has a 3.3/5 TrustPilot rating with 49 reviews, while Ment Funding has 4.8/5 with 231 reviews. Safety grades: Imperial Trader Funding C, Ment Funding A.
Who Should Choose Which
So who should pick which? Imperial Trader Funding is the stronger choice for budget-conscious traders, while Ment Funding is the better fit for trust & reputation.
Overall, Ment Funding edges ahead winning 6 out of 7 categories we compared. However, the best choice depends on your specific needs - both firms have their strengths.
Pros & Cons
Pros
Cons
Pros
Cons
Active Deals & Promo Codes
No active deals
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is better, Imperial Trader Funding or Ment Funding?
Ment Funding scores higher overall, winning 6 out of 7 comparison categories including Overall Rating, TrustPilot, Safety Grade. However, the best choice depends on your trading goals and priorities.
Which is cheaper, Imperial Trader Funding or Ment Funding?
Imperial Trader Funding has the lower starting price at $122. Imperial Trader Funding offers 14 challenge options starting from $122, while Ment Funding offers 17 options starting from $220.
Which has better reviews, Imperial Trader Funding or Ment Funding?
Ment Funding has a higher TrustPilot rating of 4.8/5. Imperial Trader Funding has 49 reviews while Ment Funding has 231.
Which offers a higher profit split, Imperial Trader Funding or Ment Funding?
Imperial Trader Funding offers a higher maximum profit split. Imperial Trader Funding offers 90% (Elite), 80% (Foundation and Instant) while Ment Funding offers 75% default (Forex, 90% with paid add-on); 80% flat (Equities); not stated (Futures).
How fast do Imperial Trader Funding and Ment Funding pay out?
Imperial Trader Funding has Every 3 valid trading days (Sim-Funded) payouts while Ment Funding offers 14-day cycle payouts. Payout speed can be an important factor when choosing a prop firm.
Are Imperial Trader Funding and Ment Funding legit?
Both firms have been independently verified by PropFirmMap. Imperial Trader Funding holds a C safety grade and a 3.3/5 TrustPilot rating. Ment Funding holds a A safety grade and a 4.8/5 TrustPilot rating. Safety grades are based on payout history, community trust signals, and regulatory transparency.
Which is better for beginners, Imperial Trader Funding or Ment Funding?
Imperial Trader Funding may be more accessible for beginners due to its lower entry price. When starting out, consider challenge cost, drawdown rules, and profit split. Use the comparison table above to find which firm fits your experience level and risk tolerance.
More Comparisons
Where these two rank in the wider market
A head-to-head answers "which of these two". These lists answer "is either one actually the best choice" - every firm we track, ranked side by side.
Browse every best-of prop firm listNot sold on either? Explore alternatives
See the closest-matched prop firms ranked head-to-head against each contender, with live 2026 prices and safety grades.