Ment Funding vs Quant Tekel (Ascendx): Head-to-Head Comparison (2026)
Verdict: Who Wins?
Quant Tekel (Ascendx)
2 wins
Best For:
Quant Tekel (Ascendx)
Quant Tekel (Ascendx)
Visual Comparison
Save 50% on Quant Tekel (Ascendx) today
Head-to-Head Comparison
| Ment Funding | Metric | Quant Tekel (Ascendx) |
|---|---|---|
| 7.2/10 | PFM Score | 8.0/10 ★ |
| 4.9/5 (231) ★ | TrustPilot | 4.3/5 (12,362) |
| A | Safety Grade | A |
| 78.3 B+ ★ | Trust Score | 66.9 B |
| 75% default (Forex, 90% with paid add-on); 80% flat (Equities); not stated (Futures) ★ | Profit Split | 80% (up to 90%) |
| 5% (Forex), 3% (Futures), 2% (Equities), balance-based, recalculated daily at 5PM EST | Daily Drawdown | 3-4% daily, 6-10% max (varies by program) |
| 14-day cycle | Payout Frequency | Bi-weekly (Prime) / On-demand (Instant, Power) |
| $220 | Starting Price | $26 ★ |
| White-Label | Technology | White-Label |
| DXTrade, cTrader, Match Trader, Atas, Rithmic, GooeyPro | Platforms | cTrader, MT5, TradeLocker |
| No | Direct Path to Funded | No |
| United States | Country | South Africa |
| Jan 2021 | Established | Oct 2023 |
| 17 options | Challenge Options | 11 options |
Price Comparison by Account Size
Cheapest challenge price at each account size (where both firms offer the same size)
| Account Size | Ment Funding | Quant Tekel (Ascendx) | Savings |
|---|---|---|---|
| $5K | $220 | $26 ★ | Save $194 |
| $10K | $420 | $52 ★ | Save $368 |
| $25K | $250 | $105 ★ | Save $145 |
| $50K | $450 | $210 ★ | Save $240 |
| $100K | $750 | $400 ★ | Save $350 |
| $200K | $1,500 | $1,300 ★ | Save $200 |
Ment Funding vs Quant Tekel (Ascendx): Detailed Analysis
Ment Funding and Quant Tekel (Ascendx) are both CFD firms. Ment Funding has been in business longer, established in 2021, while Quant Tekel (Ascendx) was founded in 2023.
Pricing
In terms of pricing, Quant Tekel (Ascendx) is more affordable with challenges starting at $26, which is $194 less than Ment Funding's starting price of $220. Ment Funding offers 17 challenge options, while Quant Tekel (Ascendx) offers 11.
Account Sizes
On account sizing, Ment Funding offers account sizes from $1 to $400 across 9 funding tiers, while Quant Tekel (Ascendx) offers account sizes from $5 to $200 across 6 funding tiers. Picking the right tier matters because both the entry cost and the maximum capital you can scale to are tied to the account size you start with.
Trading Platforms
For trading platforms, Ment Funding supports DXTrade, cTrader, Match Trader, Atas, Rithmic and GooeyPro, while Quant Tekel (Ascendx) runs on cTrader, MT5 and TradeLocker. If you already trade on a specific platform, this can be the deciding factor between the two.
Profit Split & Payouts
Ment Funding offers 75% default (Forex, 90% with paid add-on); 80% flat (Equities); not stated (Futures) profit split, while Quant Tekel (Ascendx) offers 80% (up to 90%). Ment Funding pays out 14-day cycle, and Quant Tekel (Ascendx) pays out Bi-weekly (Prime) / On-demand (Instant, Power).
Risk & Drawdown Rules
Risk rules are a key difference for funded traders: Ment Funding lists its daily drawdown as "5% (Forex), 3% (Futures), 2% (Equities), balance-based, recalculated daily at 5PM EST", while Quant Tekel (Ascendx) lists "3-4% daily, 6-10% max (varies by program)". Always confirm the drawdown type before buying, since a trailing rule behaves very differently from a static end-of-day one.
Trust & Safety
For trust and reputation, Ment Funding has a 4.9/5 TrustPilot rating with 231 reviews, while Quant Tekel (Ascendx) has 4.3/5 with 12,362 reviews. Safety grades: Ment Funding A, Quant Tekel (Ascendx) A.
Who Should Choose Which
So who should pick which? Ment Funding is the stronger choice for trust & reputation, while Quant Tekel (Ascendx) is the better fit for budget-conscious traders and fast payouts.
Overall, Ment Funding edges ahead winning 4 out of 6 categories we compared. However, the best choice depends on your specific needs - both firms have their strengths.
Pros & Cons
Pros
Cons
Quant Tekel (Ascendx)
Pros
Cons
Active Deals & Promo Codes
No active deals
Quant Tekel (Ascendx)
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is better, Ment Funding or Quant Tekel (Ascendx)?
Ment Funding scores higher overall, winning 4 out of 6 comparison categories including TrustPilot, Trust Score, Challenge Variety. However, the best choice depends on your trading goals and priorities.
Which is cheaper, Ment Funding or Quant Tekel (Ascendx)?
Quant Tekel (Ascendx) has the lower starting price at $26. Ment Funding offers 17 challenge options starting from $220, while Quant Tekel (Ascendx) offers 11 options starting from $26.
Which has better reviews, Ment Funding or Quant Tekel (Ascendx)?
Ment Funding has a higher TrustPilot rating of 4.9/5. Ment Funding has 231 reviews while Quant Tekel (Ascendx) has 12,362.
Which offers a higher profit split, Ment Funding or Quant Tekel (Ascendx)?
Ment Funding offers a higher maximum profit split. Ment Funding offers 75% default (Forex, 90% with paid add-on); 80% flat (Equities); not stated (Futures) while Quant Tekel (Ascendx) offers 80% (up to 90%).
How fast do Ment Funding and Quant Tekel (Ascendx) pay out?
Ment Funding has 14-day cycle payouts while Quant Tekel (Ascendx) offers Bi-weekly (Prime) / On-demand (Instant, Power) payouts. Payout speed can be an important factor when choosing a prop firm.
Are Ment Funding and Quant Tekel (Ascendx) legit?
Both firms have been independently verified by PropFirmMap. Ment Funding holds a A safety grade and a 4.9/5 TrustPilot rating. Quant Tekel (Ascendx) holds a A safety grade and a 4.3/5 TrustPilot rating. Safety grades are based on payout history, community trust signals, and regulatory transparency.
Which is better for beginners, Ment Funding or Quant Tekel (Ascendx)?
Quant Tekel (Ascendx) may be more accessible for beginners due to its lower entry price. When starting out, consider challenge cost, drawdown rules, and profit split. Use the comparison table above to find which firm fits your experience level and risk tolerance.
More Comparisons
Not sold on either? Explore alternatives
See the closest-matched prop firms ranked head-to-head against each contender, with live 2026 prices and safety grades.