Skip to main content

Funding Pips

2.9 A+
United Arab Emirates CFD
VS

Funding Traders

2.3 B
Hong Kong CFD
Key Differences
Safety A+ vs B Price $29 vs $39

Verdict: Who Wins?

Funding Pips 5 wins Our Pick
5 1
Funding Traders 1 wins
Overall Rating 2.9 vs 2.3
TrustPilot 4.5 vs 3.4
Starting Price $29 vs $39
Profit Split Both 60-100%
Safety Grade A+ vs B
Challenge Variety 24 vs 20 options
Platform Choice 4 vs 2 platforms

Best For:

Budget-conscious traders Funding Pips
Trust & reputation Funding Pips
Fast payouts Funding Pips

Visual Comparison

Funding Pips Funding Traders

Head-to-Head Comparison

Funding Pips Metric Funding Traders
2.9/10 PFM Score 2.3/10
4.5/5 (52,621) TrustPilot 3.4/5 (3,269)
A+ Safety Grade B
60-100% Profit Split 80-100% (varies by program)
Varies: 3-5% daily, 5-10% max Daily Drawdown 3-5% daily, 6-10% max
Weekly (Tuesday) Payout Frequency 14-21 Days
$29 Starting Price $39
Proprietary Technology Proprietary
cTrader, Match Trader, MT5, TradeLocker Platforms MT5, TradeLocker
No Direct Path to Funded No
United Arab Emirates Country Hong Kong
Jan 2022 Established
20 options Challenge Options 24 options

Price Comparison by Account Size

Cheapest challenge price at each account size (where both firms offer the same size)

Account Size Funding Pips Funding Traders Savings
$5K $29 $39 Save $10
$10K $55 $59 Save $4
$25K $109 $119 Save $10
$50K $219 $229 Save $10
$100K $399 $419 Save $20

Funding Pips vs Funding Traders: Detailed Analysis

Funding Pips and Funding Traders are both CFD firms.

In terms of pricing, Funding Pips is more affordable with challenges starting at $29, which is $10 less than Funding Traders's starting price of $39. Funding Pips offers 20 challenge options, while Funding Traders offers 24.

Funding Pips offers 60-100% profit split, while Funding Traders offers 80-100% (varies by program). Funding Pips pays out Weekly (Tuesday), and Funding Traders pays out 14-21 Days.

For trust and reputation, Funding Pips has a 4.5/5 TrustPilot rating with 52,621 reviews, while Funding Traders has 3.4/5 with 3,269 reviews. Safety grades: Funding Pips A+, Funding Traders B.

Overall, Funding Pips edges ahead winning 5 out of 6 categories we compared. However, the best choice depends on your specific needs — both firms have their strengths.

Pros & Cons

Funding Pips
Pros
Lots of payment methods & Platforms. Well made payout rules
Cons
A splippage sometimes higher than it should be
Funding Traders
Pros
Four program tracks: Instant Funded, 2-Step Pro10, 2-Step Pro6, 1-Step Pro. Profit splits up to 100%. FT40 promo code, TRYFT 50% off first challenge.
Cons
15% consistency score on Instant Funded. 50% consistency on 1-Step Pro. Min 4 trading days on Evaluation programs.

Active Deals & Promo Codes

Funding Pips
20% OFF 20% off first challenge
20% OFF 20% off all challenges
25% OFF 25% off all challenges
Funding Traders
40% OFF 40% OFF + Pass and Get a FREE Account
50% OFF 50% off your first funded challenge
50% OFF 50% off limited-time promotion (tax-season)

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better, Funding Pips or Funding Traders?

Funding Pips scores higher overall, winning 5 out of 6 comparison categories including Overall Rating, TrustPilot, Starting Price. However, the best choice depends on your trading goals and priorities.

Which is cheaper, Funding Pips or Funding Traders?

Funding Pips has the lower starting price at $29. Funding Pips offers 20 challenge options starting from $29, while Funding Traders offers 24 options starting from $39.

Which has better reviews, Funding Pips or Funding Traders?

Funding Pips has a higher TrustPilot rating of 4.5/5. Funding Pips has 52,621 reviews while Funding Traders has 3,269.

Which offers a higher profit split, Funding Pips or Funding Traders?

Funding Pips offers a higher maximum profit split. Funding Pips offers 60-100% while Funding Traders offers 80-100% (varies by program).

How fast do Funding Pips and Funding Traders pay out?

Funding Pips has Weekly (Tuesday) payouts while Funding Traders offers 14-21 Days payouts. Payout speed can be an important factor when choosing a prop firm.