Skip to main content

Funding Pips vs Paid To Trade: Head-to-Head Comparison (2026)

Funding Pips

8.9 A+
United Arab Emirates CFD
VS

Paid To Trade

4.0 D
United Arab Emirates CFD
Key Differences
Safety A+ vs D Payouts Weekly vs On-Demand Split 100% vs 90% Price $29 vs $59

Verdict: Who Wins?

Funding Pips 6 wins Decisive Win
6 - 0
Paid To Trade 0 wins
Overall Rating 8.9 vs 4.0 Decisive
Starting Price $29 vs $59 Decisive
Profit Split 80-100% vs 80% base on Instant Funding and 2-Step Static, 70% on 1-Step Static with paid upgrades to 80% or 90%, and 50% then 70% then 90% across payouts on 1-Step Trail Decisive
Safety Grade A+ vs D Decisive
Trust Score 84.2/100 vs 6.5/100 Decisive
Challenge Variety 21 vs 16 options Clear

Best For:

Budget-conscious traders Funding Pips
Maximum profit potential Funding Pips
Trust & reputation Funding Pips
Fast payouts Paid To Trade

Visual Comparison

Funding Pips Paid To Trade

Save 25% on Funding Pips today

from $29
Save 25% Now Verified deal

Head-to-Head Comparison

Funding Pips Metric Paid To Trade
8.9/10 PFM Score 4.0/10
4.5/5 (62,062) TrustPilot -
A+ Safety Grade D
84.2 A Trust Score 6.5 F
80-100% Profit Split 80% base on Instant Funding and 2-Step Static, 70% on 1-Step Static with paid upgrades to 80% or 90%, and 50% then 70% then 90% across payouts on 1-Step Trail
3% (Zero/2-Step Pro), 4% (1-Step), 5% (2-Step Standard) Daily Drawdown 4% static (2-Step Static and Instant Funding), 3% static (1-Step Static, upgradeable to 4% with the Extended Drawdown add-on), none (1-Step Trail)
Weekly Payout Frequency Weekly (Static and Instant), Bi-weekly (1-Step Trail)
$29 Starting Price $59
Proprietary Technology White-Label
cTrader, Match Trader, MT5 Platforms Match Trader, Platform5
No Direct Path to Funded No
United Arab Emirates Country United Arab Emirates
Oct 2022 Established Jun 2025
21 options Challenge Options 16 options

Price Comparison by Account Size

Cheapest challenge price at each account size (where both firms offer the same size)

Account Size Funding Pips Paid To Trade Savings
$5K $29 $59 Save $30
$10K $55 $109 Save $54
$25K $109 $299 Save $190
$50K $219 $399 Save $180
$100K $399 $699 Save $300

Funding Pips vs Paid To Trade: Detailed Analysis

Funding Pips and Paid To Trade are both CFD firms. Funding Pips has been in business longer, established in 2022, while Paid To Trade was founded in 2025.

Pricing

In terms of pricing, Funding Pips is more affordable with challenges starting at $29, which is $30 less than Paid To Trade's starting price of $59. Funding Pips offers 21 challenge options, while Paid To Trade offers 16.

Account Sizes

On account sizing, Funding Pips offers account sizes from $5 to $200 across 6 funding tiers, while Paid To Trade offers account sizes from $5 to $100 across 8 funding tiers. Picking the right tier matters because both the entry cost and the maximum capital you can scale to are tied to the account size you start with.

Trading Platforms

For trading platforms, Funding Pips supports cTrader, Match Trader and MT5, while Paid To Trade runs on Match Trader and Platform5. If you already trade on a specific platform, this can be the deciding factor between the two.

Profit Split & Payouts

Funding Pips offers 80-100% profit split, while Paid To Trade offers 80% base on Instant Funding and 2-Step Static, 70% on 1-Step Static with paid upgrades to 80% or 90%, and 50% then 70% then 90% across payouts on 1-Step Trail. Funding Pips pays out Weekly, and Paid To Trade pays out Weekly (Static and Instant), Bi-weekly (1-Step Trail).

Risk & Drawdown Rules

Risk rules are a key difference for funded traders: Funding Pips lists its daily drawdown as "3% (Zero/2-Step Pro), 4% (1-Step), 5% (2-Step Standard)", while Paid To Trade lists "4% static (2-Step Static and Instant Funding), 3% static (1-Step Static, upgradeable to 4% with the Extended Drawdown add-on), none (1-Step Trail)". Always confirm the drawdown type before buying, since a trailing rule behaves very differently from a static end-of-day one.

Payout Methods

When it comes to getting paid, Funding Pips supports withdrawals via Rise, Crypto and Wire Transfer, while Paid To Trade pays out through Crypto (USDT TRC-20) and Wire Transfer.

Trust & Safety

For trust and reputation, Funding Pips has a 4.5/5 TrustPilot rating with 62,062 reviews. Safety grades: Funding Pips A+, Paid To Trade D.

Who Should Choose Which

So who should pick which? Funding Pips is the stronger choice for budget-conscious traders, maximum profit potential and trust & reputation, while Paid To Trade is the better fit for fast payouts.

Overall, Funding Pips edges ahead winning 6 out of 6 categories we compared. However, the best choice depends on your specific needs - both firms have their strengths.

Pros & Cons

Funding Pips
Pros
Up to 100% profit split with flexible reward cycles (weekly, bi-weekly, monthly, daily, on-demand). Starting from $29. Zero reward denial policy. Multiple evaluation models including 1-Step, 2-Step Standard, and Zero instant funding. Scale to $2M in prime capital. Over $263M distributed to 3M+ traders worldwide.
Cons
News trading restricted on funded/master accounts (5-minute window). Weekend holding not permitted on master accounts (positions auto-closed Friday). HFT, tick scalping, hedging, and latency arbitrage prohibited. Consistency score soft rule on funded accounts may delay rewards.
Paid To Trade
Pros
Weekly payouts with instant approval and a published per-payout ledger; no profit cap and no consistency rule on Static and Instant accounts; no time limit on any evaluation; A-book execution routed to a named liquidity provider (FX-EDGE); EAs allowed; weekend holding allowed; choice of Match Trader or Platform 5.
Cons
TrustPilot has withheld this company's rating for a breach of its guidelines and states it removed a number of fake reviews, while the firm's own /reviews/ page claims a 4.8 TrustPilot rating the profile does not support and lists account prices that contradict the live checkout. News trading is prohibited on all Static and Instant accounts, hedging is banned outright, evaluation fees are non-refundable, and account sizes stop at $80K on 2-Step Static or $100K on 1-Step Trail before the scaling programme.

Active Deals & Promo Codes

Funding Pips
20% OFF 20% off first challenge
20% OFF 20% off all challenges
25% OFF 25% off all challenges
Paid To Trade

No active deals

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better, Funding Pips or Paid To Trade?

Funding Pips scores higher overall, winning 6 out of 6 comparison categories including Overall Rating, Starting Price, Profit Split. However, the best choice depends on your trading goals and priorities.

Which is cheaper, Funding Pips or Paid To Trade?

Funding Pips has the lower starting price at $29. Funding Pips offers 21 challenge options starting from $29, while Paid To Trade offers 16 options starting from $59.

Which offers a higher profit split, Funding Pips or Paid To Trade?

Funding Pips offers a higher maximum profit split. Funding Pips offers 80-100% while Paid To Trade offers 80% base on Instant Funding and 2-Step Static, 70% on 1-Step Static with paid upgrades to 80% or 90%, and 50% then 70% then 90% across payouts on 1-Step Trail.

How fast do Funding Pips and Paid To Trade pay out?

Funding Pips has Weekly payouts while Paid To Trade offers Weekly (Static and Instant), Bi-weekly (1-Step Trail) payouts. Payout speed can be an important factor when choosing a prop firm.

Are Funding Pips and Paid To Trade legit?

Both firms have been independently verified by PropFirmMap. Funding Pips holds a A+ safety grade and a 4.5/5 TrustPilot rating. Paid To Trade holds a D safety grade. Safety grades are based on payout history, community trust signals, and regulatory transparency.

Which is better for beginners, Funding Pips or Paid To Trade?

Funding Pips may be more accessible for beginners due to its lower entry price. When starting out, consider challenge cost, drawdown rules, and profit split. Use the comparison table above to find which firm fits your experience level and risk tolerance.

Not sold on either? Explore alternatives

See the closest-matched prop firms ranked head-to-head against each contender, with live 2026 prices and safety grades.