Skip to main content

Nordic Funder

2.1 B
Sweden CFD
VS

Funding Pips

2.9 A+
United Arab Emirates CFD

Verdict: Who Wins?

Nordic Funder 0 wins
0 7
Funding Pips 7 wins Our Pick
Overall Rating 2.9 vs 2.1
TrustPilot 4.5 vs 3.2
Starting Price $29 vs $100
Profit Split 60-100% vs 75% (up to 90%)
Safety Grade A+ vs B
Challenge Variety 20 vs 13 options
Platform Choice 4 vs 1 platforms

Best For:

Budget-conscious traders Funding Pips
Maximum profit potential Funding Pips
Trust & reputation Funding Pips
Fast payouts Funding Pips

Visual Comparison

Nordic Funder Funding Pips

Head-to-Head Comparison

Nordic Funder Metric Funding Pips
2.1/10 PFM Score 2.9/10
3.2/5 (56) TrustPilot 4.5/5 (52,198)
B Safety Grade A+
75% (up to 90%) Profit Split 60-100%
4% daily / 6% max (One-Stage), 5% daily / 10% max (Pro), 3% daily / 6% trailing (Two-Stage) Daily Drawdown Varies: 3-5% daily, 5-10% max
Every 14 days via Rise Payout Frequency Weekly (Tuesday)
$100 Starting Price $29
White-Label Technology Proprietary
MT4 Platforms cTrader, Match Trader, MT5, TradeLocker
No Direct Path to Funded No
Sweden Country United Arab Emirates
Nov 2021 Established Jan 2022
13 options Challenge Options 20 options

Price Comparison by Account Size

Cheapest challenge price at each account size (where both firms offer the same size)

Account Size Nordic Funder Funding Pips Savings
$10K $100 $55 Save $45
$25K $200 $109 Save $91
$50K $350 $219 Save $131
$100K $600 $399 Save $201

Nordic Funder vs Funding Pips: Detailed Analysis

Nordic Funder and Funding Pips are both CFD firms. Nordic Funder has been in business longer, established in 2021, while Funding Pips was founded in 2022.

In terms of pricing, Funding Pips is more affordable with challenges starting at $29, which is $71 less than Nordic Funder's starting price of $100. Nordic Funder offers 13 challenge options, while Funding Pips offers 20.

Nordic Funder offers 75% (up to 90%) profit split, while Funding Pips offers 60-100%. Nordic Funder pays out Every 14 days via Rise, and Funding Pips pays out Weekly (Tuesday).

For trust and reputation, Nordic Funder has a 3.2/5 TrustPilot rating with 56 reviews, while Funding Pips has 4.5/5 with 52,198 reviews. Safety grades: Nordic Funder B, Funding Pips A+.

Overall, Funding Pips edges ahead winning 7 out of 7 categories we compared. However, the best choice depends on your specific needs — both firms have their strengths.

Pros & Cons

Nordic Funder
Pros
No commissions, Fast support & reliable payouts
Cons
High Price | WARNING: Purchases temporarily unavailable (system maintenance). Red flags include fake payout certificate allegations and Tradiac predecessor concerns. Only 56 TrustPilot reviews with polarized ratings (3.2/5).
Funding Pips
Pros
Lots of payment methods & Platforms. Well made payout rules
Cons
A splippage sometimes higher than it should be

Active Deals & Promo Codes

Nordic Funder

No active deals

Funding Pips
20% OFF 20% off first challenge
20% OFF 20% off all challenges
25% OFF 25% off all challenges

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better, Nordic Funder or Funding Pips?

Funding Pips scores higher overall, winning 7 out of 7 comparison categories including Overall Rating, TrustPilot, Starting Price. However, the best choice depends on your trading goals and priorities.

Which is cheaper, Nordic Funder or Funding Pips?

Funding Pips has the lower starting price at $29. Nordic Funder offers 13 challenge options starting from $100, while Funding Pips offers 20 options starting from $29.

Which has better reviews, Nordic Funder or Funding Pips?

Funding Pips has a higher TrustPilot rating of 4.5/5. Nordic Funder has 56 reviews while Funding Pips has 52,198.

Which offers a higher profit split, Nordic Funder or Funding Pips?

Funding Pips offers a higher maximum profit split. Nordic Funder offers 75% (up to 90%) while Funding Pips offers 60-100%.

How fast do Nordic Funder and Funding Pips pay out?

Nordic Funder has Every 14 days via Rise payouts while Funding Pips offers Weekly (Tuesday) payouts. Payout speed can be an important factor when choosing a prop firm.