Pipster vs Quant Tekel (Ascendx): Head-to-Head Comparison (2026)
Verdict: Who Wins?
Best For:
Visual Comparison
Save 60% on Quant Tekel (Ascendx) today
Head-to-Head Comparison
| Pipster | Metric | Quant Tekel (Ascendx) |
|---|---|---|
| 5.4/10 | PFM Score | 7.9/10 ★ |
| 4.1/5 (22) ★ | TrustPilot | 3.8/5 (13,074) |
| B | Safety Grade | B+ ★ |
| 51.8 C | Trust Score | 66.8 B ★ |
| 80% | Profit Split | 80% (up to 90%) ★ |
| 4% on the 1-Phase (evaluation and funded), 5% on both 2-Phase stages and when funded, 3% on Instant Funded. Pipster Entry has NO daily loss limit during evaluation and 3% once activated. Every daily limit is static for the day, set from the equity recorded at the 22:00 UTC New York session rollover. | Daily Drawdown | 3-4% daily, 6-10% max (varies by program) |
| Weekly | Payout Frequency | 14 Days (2 Step / 2 Step Elite), Bi-weekly (Pay When Funded 1 Step), On-Demand (Power) |
| $1.99 ★ | Starting Price | $10 |
| White-Label | Technology | White-Label |
| Match Trader | Platforms | MT5, TradeLocker |
| No | Direct Path to Funded | No |
| United Kingdom | Country | South Africa |
| Jun 2025 | Established | Oct 2023 |
| 22 options | Challenge Options | 26 options |
Price Comparison by Account Size
Cheapest challenge price at each account size (where both firms offer the same size)
| Account Size | Pipster | Quant Tekel (Ascendx) | Savings |
|---|---|---|---|
| $5K | $2 ★ | $10 | Save $8 |
| $10K | $2 ★ | $15 | Save $13 |
| $25K | $2 ★ | $25 | Save $23 |
| $50K | $2 ★ | $25 | Save $23 |
| $100K | $2 ★ | $25 | Save $23 |
Pipster vs Quant Tekel (Ascendx): Detailed Analysis
Pipster and Quant Tekel (Ascendx) are both CFD firms. Quant Tekel (Ascendx) has been in business longer, established in 2023, while Pipster was founded in 2025.
Pricing
In terms of pricing, Pipster is more affordable with challenges starting at $2, which is $8 less than Quant Tekel (Ascendx)'s starting price of $10. Pipster offers 22 challenge options, while Quant Tekel (Ascendx) offers 26.
Account Sizes
On account sizing, Pipster offers account sizes from $1 to $100 across 6 funding tiers, while Quant Tekel (Ascendx) offers account sizes from $5 to $200 across 6 funding tiers. Picking the right tier matters because both the entry cost and the maximum capital you can scale to are tied to the account size you start with.
Trading Platforms
For trading platforms, Pipster supports Match Trader, while Quant Tekel (Ascendx) runs on MT5 and TradeLocker. If you already trade on a specific platform, this can be the deciding factor between the two.
Profit Split & Payouts
Pipster offers 80% profit split, while Quant Tekel (Ascendx) offers 80% (up to 90%). Pipster pays out Weekly, and Quant Tekel (Ascendx) pays out 14 Days (2 Step / 2 Step Elite), Bi-weekly (Pay When Funded 1 Step), On-Demand (Power).
Risk & Drawdown Rules
Risk rules are a key difference for funded traders: Pipster lists its daily drawdown as "4% on the 1-Phase (evaluation and funded), 5% on both 2-Phase stages and when funded, 3% on Instant Funded. Pipster Entry has NO daily loss limit during evaluation and 3% once activated. Every daily limit is static for the day, set from the equity recorded at the 22:00 UTC New York session rollover.", while Quant Tekel (Ascendx) lists "3-4% daily, 6-10% max (varies by program)". Always confirm the drawdown type before buying, since a trailing rule behaves very differently from a static end-of-day one.
Payout Methods
Pipster supports withdrawals via Rise, Crypto and Wire Transfer.
Trust & Safety
For trust and reputation, Pipster has a 4.1/5 TrustPilot rating with 22 reviews, while Quant Tekel (Ascendx) has 3.8/5 with 13,074 reviews. Safety grades: Pipster B, Quant Tekel (Ascendx) B+.
Who Should Choose Which
So who should pick which? Pipster is the stronger choice for budget-conscious traders and fast payouts, while Quant Tekel (Ascendx) is the better fit for maximum profit potential and trust & reputation.
Overall, Quant Tekel (Ascendx) edges ahead winning 5 out of 7 categories we compared. However, the best choice depends on your specific needs - both firms have their strengths.
Pros & Cons
Pros
Cons
Pros
Cons
Active Deals & Promo Codes
No active deals
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is better, Pipster or Quant Tekel (Ascendx)?
Quant Tekel (Ascendx) scores higher overall, winning 5 out of 7 comparison categories including Overall Rating, Profit Split, Safety Grade. However, the best choice depends on your trading goals and priorities.
Which is cheaper, Pipster or Quant Tekel (Ascendx)?
Pipster has the lower starting price at $2. Pipster offers 22 challenge options starting from $2, while Quant Tekel (Ascendx) offers 26 options starting from $10.
Which has better reviews, Pipster or Quant Tekel (Ascendx)?
Pipster has a higher TrustPilot rating of 4.1/5. Pipster has 22 reviews while Quant Tekel (Ascendx) has 13,074.
Which offers a higher profit split, Pipster or Quant Tekel (Ascendx)?
Quant Tekel (Ascendx) offers a higher maximum profit split. Pipster offers 80% while Quant Tekel (Ascendx) offers 80% (up to 90%).
How fast do Pipster and Quant Tekel (Ascendx) pay out?
Pipster has Weekly payouts while Quant Tekel (Ascendx) offers 14 Days (2 Step / 2 Step Elite), Bi-weekly (Pay When Funded 1 Step), On-Demand (Power) payouts. Payout speed can be an important factor when choosing a prop firm.
Are Pipster and Quant Tekel (Ascendx) legit?
Both firms have been independently verified by PropFirmMap. Pipster holds a B safety grade and a 4.1/5 TrustPilot rating. Quant Tekel (Ascendx) holds a B+ safety grade and a 3.8/5 TrustPilot rating. Safety grades are based on payout history, community trust signals, and regulatory transparency.
Which is better for beginners, Pipster or Quant Tekel (Ascendx)?
Pipster may be more accessible for beginners due to its lower entry price. When starting out, consider challenge cost, drawdown rules, and profit split. Use the comparison table above to find which firm fits your experience level and risk tolerance.
More Comparisons
Where these two rank in the wider market
A head-to-head answers "which of these two". These lists answer "is either one actually the best choice" - every firm we track, ranked side by side.
Browse every best-of prop firm listNot sold on either? Explore alternatives
See the closest-matched prop firms ranked head-to-head against each contender, with live 2026 prices and safety grades.