Skip to main content

For Traders

2.5 B
United Arab Emirates CFD
VS

OneFunded

2.7 B+
United Kingdom CFD

Verdict: Who Wins?

For Traders 0 wins
0 4
OneFunded 4 wins Our Pick
Overall Rating 2.7 vs 2.5
TrustPilot 4.4 vs 4
Starting Price $16 vs $23
Profit Split Both 80% (up to 90%)
Safety Grade B+ vs B

Best For:

Budget-conscious traders OneFunded
Trust & reputation OneFunded
Fast payouts OneFunded

Visual Comparison

For Traders OneFunded

Head-to-Head Comparison

For Traders Metric OneFunded
2.5/10 PFM Score 2.7/10
4/5 (1,667) Suspended TrustPilot 4.4/5 (215)
B Safety Grade B+
80% (up to 90%) Profit Split 80% (up to 90%)
Varies by plan (see challenge rules) Daily Drawdown 4-5% daily / 6-10% total (equity-based)
Bi-weekly Payout Frequency Biweekly (weekly available as add-on)
$23 Starting Price $16
White-Label Technology Proprietary
cTrader, TradeLocker Platforms cTrader, MT5, TradeLocker
No Direct Path to Funded No
United Arab Emirates Country United Kingdom
Jul 2023 Established Jan 2024
25 options Challenge Options 24 options

Price Comparison by Account Size

Cheapest challenge price at each account size (where both firms offer the same size)

Account Size For Traders OneFunded Savings
$25K $149 $88 Save $61
$50K $235 $137 Save $98
$100K $349 $361 Save $12

For Traders vs OneFunded: Detailed Analysis

For Traders and OneFunded are both CFD firms. For Traders has been in business longer, established in 2023, while OneFunded was founded in 2024.

In terms of pricing, OneFunded is more affordable with challenges starting at $16, which is $7 less than For Traders's starting price of $23. For Traders offers 25 challenge options, while OneFunded offers 24.

For Traders offers 80% (up to 90%) profit split, while OneFunded offers 80% (up to 90%). For Traders pays out Bi-weekly, and OneFunded pays out Biweekly (weekly available as add-on).

For trust and reputation, For Traders has a 4/5 TrustPilot rating with 1,667 reviews (currently suspended), while OneFunded has 4.4/5 with 215 reviews. Safety grades: For Traders B, OneFunded B+.

Overall, OneFunded edges ahead winning 4 out of 4 categories we compared. However, the best choice depends on your specific needs — both firms have their strengths.

Pros & Cons

For Traders
Pros
Fast customer cuspport
Cons
TrustPilot SUSPENDED for fake reviews (1,664 reviews removed). Currently migrating to new broker (purchases temporarily unavailable). Dual entity structure (Saint Lucia + Dubai). High leverage 1:125 on forex.
OneFunded
Pros
4 flexible challenge types (Core/Flash/Value/Flex). Accounts from \K to \00K. Biweekly payouts within 24 hours. cTrader, MT5, and TradeLocker platforms.
Cons
New firm (2024), limited track record. Only 215 TrustPilot reviews. Base profit split 80% (needs add-on for 90%). Minimum \00 payout threshold.

Active Deals & Promo Codes

For Traders
30% OFF 30% off all challenges - Easter 2026
20% OFF 20% off all challenges - New user discount
15% OFF 15% off all challenges
30% OFF 30% off + Buy One Get One Free challenge
OneFunded
10% OFF 10% off all challenges

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better, For Traders or OneFunded?

OneFunded scores higher overall, winning 4 out of 4 comparison categories including Overall Rating, TrustPilot, Starting Price. However, the best choice depends on your trading goals and priorities.

Which is cheaper, For Traders or OneFunded?

OneFunded has the lower starting price at $16. For Traders offers 25 challenge options starting from $23, while OneFunded offers 24 options starting from $16.

Which has better reviews, For Traders or OneFunded?

OneFunded has a higher TrustPilot rating of 4.4/5. For Traders has 1,667 reviews while OneFunded has 215.

Which offers a higher profit split, For Traders or OneFunded?

For Traders offers a higher maximum profit split. For Traders offers 80% (up to 90%) while OneFunded offers 80% (up to 90%).

How fast do For Traders and OneFunded pay out?

For Traders has Bi-weekly payouts while OneFunded offers Biweekly (weekly available as add-on) payouts. Payout speed can be an important factor when choosing a prop firm.