Skip to main content

Pipcy vs Quant Tekel (Ascendx): Head-to-Head Comparison (2026)

Pipcy

United Arab Emirates CFD
VS
Key Differences
Split 95% vs 90% Price $21 vs $10

Verdict: Who Wins?

Pipcy 2 wins
2 - 4
Quant Tekel (Ascendx) 4 wins Decisive Win
Overall Rating 7.9 vs 0.0 Decisive
TrustPilot 4.3 vs 3.9 Clear
Starting Price $10 vs $21 Decisive
Profit Split Up to 95% vs 80% (up to 90%) Clear
Safety Grade B+ vs Decisive
Trust Score 72.1/100 vs 39.6/100 Decisive

Best For:

Budget-conscious traders Quant Tekel (Ascendx)
Maximum profit potential Pipcy
Trust & reputation Quant Tekel (Ascendx)
Fast payouts Quant Tekel (Ascendx)

Visual Comparison

Pipcy Quant Tekel (Ascendx)

Save 50% on Quant Tekel (Ascendx) today

from $10
Save 50% Now Verified deal

Head-to-Head Comparison

Pipcy Metric Quant Tekel (Ascendx)
- PFM Score 7.9/10
4.3/5 (42) TrustPilot 3.9/5 (13,032)
- Safety Grade B+
39.6 F Trust Score 72.1 B+
Up to 95% Profit Split 80% (up to 90%)
None. Pipcy publishes no daily loss limit on any challenge model, and no trailing drawdown; only the overall max loss applies (12% absolute on Classic, 250 pips on Pips Mastery). Daily Drawdown 3-4% daily, 6-10% max (varies by program)
Every 7 calendar days Payout Frequency 14 Days (2 Step / 2 Step Elite), Bi-weekly (Pay When Funded 1 Step), On-Demand (Power)
$21 Starting Price $10
White-Label Technology White-Label
MT5, Pipcy Trading Platform Platforms MT5, TradeLocker
No Direct Path to Funded No
United Arab Emirates Country South Africa
- Established Oct 2023
24 options Challenge Options 26 options

Price Comparison by Account Size

Cheapest challenge price at each account size (where both firms offer the same size)

Account Size Pipcy Quant Tekel (Ascendx) Savings
$5K $31 $10 Save $21
$10K $45 $15 Save $30
$25K $109 $25 Save $84
$50K $195 $25 Save $170
$100K $415 $25 Save $390

Pipcy vs Quant Tekel (Ascendx): Detailed Analysis

Pipcy and Quant Tekel (Ascendx) are both CFD firms.

Pricing

In terms of pricing, Quant Tekel (Ascendx) is more affordable with challenges starting at $10, which is $11 less than Pipcy's starting price of $21. Pipcy offers 24 challenge options, while Quant Tekel (Ascendx) offers 26.

Account Sizes

On account sizing, Pipcy offers account sizes from $5 to $100 across 5 funding tiers, while Quant Tekel (Ascendx) offers account sizes from $5 to $200 across 6 funding tiers. Picking the right tier matters because both the entry cost and the maximum capital you can scale to are tied to the account size you start with.

Trading Platforms

For trading platforms, Pipcy supports MT5 and Pipcy Trading Platform, while Quant Tekel (Ascendx) runs on MT5 and TradeLocker. If you already trade on a specific platform, this can be the deciding factor between the two.

Profit Split & Payouts

Pipcy offers Up to 95% profit split, while Quant Tekel (Ascendx) offers 80% (up to 90%). Pipcy pays out Every 7 calendar days, and Quant Tekel (Ascendx) pays out 14 Days (2 Step / 2 Step Elite), Bi-weekly (Pay When Funded 1 Step), On-Demand (Power).

Risk & Drawdown Rules

Risk rules are a key difference for funded traders: Pipcy lists its daily drawdown as "None. Pipcy publishes no daily loss limit on any challenge model, and no trailing drawdown; only the overall max loss applies (12% absolute on Classic, 250 pips on Pips Mastery).", while Quant Tekel (Ascendx) lists "3-4% daily, 6-10% max (varies by program)". Always confirm the drawdown type before buying, since a trailing rule behaves very differently from a static end-of-day one.

Trust & Safety

For trust and reputation, Pipcy has a 4.3/5 TrustPilot rating with 42 reviews, while Quant Tekel (Ascendx) has 3.9/5 with 13,032 reviews.

Who Should Choose Which

So who should pick which? Pipcy is the stronger choice for maximum profit potential, while Quant Tekel (Ascendx) is the better fit for budget-conscious traders, trust & reputation and fast payouts.

Overall, Quant Tekel (Ascendx) edges ahead winning 4 out of 6 categories we compared. However, the best choice depends on your specific needs - both firms have their strengths.

Pros & Cons

Pipcy
Pros
No daily drawdown limit and no trailing drawdown on any challenge model, on both the Classic and Pips Mastery programmes. 12% absolute maximum loss on Pipcy Classic, one of the widest overall loss limits published in the sector. Reward Payments are processed within 48 hours and the profit split reaches up to 95% through a nine-level Growth Plan that scales a funded account to $3,000,000 with no scaling fees. News trading, overnight holding and weekend holding are all permitted on every Challenge and funded account. Entry prices start at $21 and a WELCOME50 code takes 50% off a first challenge; a free trial is available before purchase. MetaTrader 5 plus an in-house Pipcy Trading Platform, a Swap-Free option, and zero commission on cryptocurrencies, indices and commodities.
Cons
Pipcy states plainly that it is not regulated by the FCA, ASIC or CySEC. The profit split STARTS at 50%: the advertised 95% is the ninth Growth Plan level, and each scale-up requires 25% accumulated profit left in the account plus at least 90 calendar days. No withdrawal method is published anywhere on the site: payouts are described only as going to your selected payment method. Pipcy's own blog comparison table says news trading is Not permitted on Pipcy Classic, contradicting its FAQ, its Terms of Service and its own pricing table, all of which say it is allowed. A trader may hold a maximum of three open positions in the same direction on the same asset, an account-ending rule that two TrustPilot reviewers say they only found after their challenge was closed. Only 1 funded account and 3 challenge accounts are permitted per trader, and fees are non-refundable once simulated trading starts. The TrustPilot profile carries only 42 reviews in total, so there is little long-run payout evidence, and no incorporation or launch date is published anywhere on the site.
Quant Tekel (Ascendx)
Pros
90% Profit Split
Cons
Reports of sometimes slow support

Active Deals & Promo Codes

Pipcy

No active deals

Quant Tekel (Ascendx)
50% OFF 50% off all Quant Tekel accounts

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better, Pipcy or Quant Tekel (Ascendx)?

Quant Tekel (Ascendx) scores higher overall, winning 4 out of 6 comparison categories including Overall Rating, Starting Price, Safety Grade. However, the best choice depends on your trading goals and priorities.

Which is cheaper, Pipcy or Quant Tekel (Ascendx)?

Quant Tekel (Ascendx) has the lower starting price at $10. Pipcy offers 24 challenge options starting from $21, while Quant Tekel (Ascendx) offers 26 options starting from $10.

Which has better reviews, Pipcy or Quant Tekel (Ascendx)?

Pipcy has a higher TrustPilot rating of 4.3/5. Pipcy has 42 reviews while Quant Tekel (Ascendx) has 13,032.

Which offers a higher profit split, Pipcy or Quant Tekel (Ascendx)?

Pipcy offers a higher maximum profit split. Pipcy offers Up to 95% while Quant Tekel (Ascendx) offers 80% (up to 90%).

How fast do Pipcy and Quant Tekel (Ascendx) pay out?

Pipcy has Every 7 calendar days payouts while Quant Tekel (Ascendx) offers 14 Days (2 Step / 2 Step Elite), Bi-weekly (Pay When Funded 1 Step), On-Demand (Power) payouts. Payout speed can be an important factor when choosing a prop firm.

Are Pipcy and Quant Tekel (Ascendx) legit?

Both firms have been independently verified by PropFirmMap. Pipcy holds a unrated safety grade and a 4.3/5 TrustPilot rating. Quant Tekel (Ascendx) holds a B+ safety grade and a 3.9/5 TrustPilot rating. Safety grades are based on payout history, community trust signals, and regulatory transparency.

Which is better for beginners, Pipcy or Quant Tekel (Ascendx)?

Quant Tekel (Ascendx) may be more accessible for beginners due to its lower entry price. When starting out, consider challenge cost, drawdown rules, and profit split. Use the comparison table above to find which firm fits your experience level and risk tolerance.

Not sold on either? Explore alternatives

See the closest-matched prop firms ranked head-to-head against each contender, with live 2026 prices and safety grades.