Skip to main content

MFA Traders vs Quant Tekel (Ascendx): Head-to-Head Comparison (2026)

MFA Traders

6.2 B+
Poland CFD
VS
Key Differences
Payouts On-Demand vs Bi-Weekly Price $29 vs $10

Verdict: Who Wins?

MFA Traders 2 wins
2 - 3
Quant Tekel (Ascendx) 3 wins
Overall Rating 7.9 vs 6.2 Decisive
TrustPilot 4.3 vs 3.8 Clear
Starting Price $10 vs $29 Decisive
Profit Split Both 65% (1-phase Beginner), 70% (Instant), 80% 85% 90% (2-phase Standard) Tie
Safety Grade Both B+ Tie
Trust Score 67.2/100 vs 66.8/100 Narrow
Challenge Variety 26 vs 8 options Decisive

Best For:

Budget-conscious traders Quant Tekel (Ascendx)
Trust & reputation MFA Traders
Fast payouts MFA Traders

Visual Comparison

MFA Traders Quant Tekel (Ascendx)

Save 60% on Quant Tekel (Ascendx) today

from $10
Save 60% Now Code listed by the firm 31 Aug 2026

Head-to-Head Comparison

MFA Traders Metric Quant Tekel (Ascendx)
6.2/10 PFM Score 7.9/10
4.3/5 (165) TrustPilot 3.8/5 (13,074)
B+ Safety Grade B+
67.2 B Trust Score 66.8 B
65% (1-phase Beginner), 70% (Instant), 80% 85% 90% (2-phase Standard) Profit Split 80% (up to 90%)
3.5% (1-phase Beginner, Instant Core), 4% (2-phase Professional), 5% (2-phase Standard, Instant Prime); recalculated at midnight CET off the previous day's balance Daily Drawdown 3-4% daily, 6-10% max (varies by program)
On demand Payout Frequency 14 Days (2 Step / 2 Step Elite), Bi-weekly (Pay When Funded 1 Step), On-Demand (Power)
$29 Starting Price $10
White-Label Technology White-Label
Trading View, Match Trader, MT4 Platforms MT5, TradeLocker
No Direct Path to Funded No
Poland Country South Africa
Mar 2023 Established Oct 2023
8 options Challenge Options 26 options

Price Comparison by Account Size

Cheapest challenge price at each account size (where both firms offer the same size)

Account Size MFA Traders Quant Tekel (Ascendx) Savings
$5K $69 $10 Save $59
$10K $109 $15 Save $94
$50K $389 $25 Save $364
$200K $1,097 $325 Save $772

MFA Traders vs Quant Tekel (Ascendx): Detailed Analysis

MFA Traders and Quant Tekel (Ascendx) are both CFD firms. MFA Traders has been in business longer, established in 2023, while Quant Tekel (Ascendx) was founded in 2023.

Pricing

In terms of pricing, Quant Tekel (Ascendx) is more affordable with challenges starting at $10, which is $19 less than MFA Traders's starting price of $29. MFA Traders offers 8 challenge options, while Quant Tekel (Ascendx) offers 26.

Account Sizes

On account sizing, MFA Traders offers account sizes from $1 to $200 across 6 funding tiers, while Quant Tekel (Ascendx) offers account sizes from $5 to $200 across 6 funding tiers. Picking the right tier matters because both the entry cost and the maximum capital you can scale to are tied to the account size you start with.

Trading Platforms

For trading platforms, MFA Traders supports Trading View, Match Trader and MT4, while Quant Tekel (Ascendx) runs on MT5 and TradeLocker. If you already trade on a specific platform, this can be the deciding factor between the two.

Profit Split & Payouts

MFA Traders offers 65% (1-phase Beginner), 70% (Instant), 80% 85% 90% (2-phase Standard) profit split, while Quant Tekel (Ascendx) offers 80% (up to 90%). MFA Traders pays out On demand, and Quant Tekel (Ascendx) pays out 14 Days (2 Step / 2 Step Elite), Bi-weekly (Pay When Funded 1 Step), On-Demand (Power).

Risk & Drawdown Rules

Risk rules are a key difference for funded traders: MFA Traders lists its daily drawdown as "3.5% (1-phase Beginner, Instant Core), 4% (2-phase Professional), 5% (2-phase Standard, Instant Prime); recalculated at midnight CET off the previous day's balance", while Quant Tekel (Ascendx) lists "3-4% daily, 6-10% max (varies by program)". Always confirm the drawdown type before buying, since a trailing rule behaves very differently from a static end-of-day one.

Trust & Safety

For trust and reputation, MFA Traders has a 4.3/5 TrustPilot rating with 165 reviews, while Quant Tekel (Ascendx) has 3.8/5 with 13,074 reviews. Safety grades: MFA Traders B+, Quant Tekel (Ascendx) B+.

Who Should Choose Which

So who should pick which? MFA Traders is the stronger choice for trust & reputation and fast payouts, while Quant Tekel (Ascendx) is the better fit for budget-conscious traders.

This is a close matchup with MFA Traders winning 2 and Quant Tekel (Ascendx) winning 3 of the categories we compared. The right choice depends on what matters most to you as a trader.

Pros & Cons

MFA Traders
Pros
Three routes to a funded account (1-phase Challenge, 2-phase Challenge, and an Instant account with no evaluation); no time limit on Challenge accounts; entry tickets from 29$ on a $1,000 account; a free trial on a $50,000 account; payouts advertised as completed within 60 minutes after risk-team approval; MT4, Match Trade and Trading View; a scaling programme to $2,000,000; an EU-registered operator (My Funding Account P.S.A., KRS 0001023771, Katowice, Poland) with a published address.
Cons
Profit split starts at 65% on the 1-phase Beginner tier (70% Instant, 80% 85% 90% two-phase). News trading is permitted only during the Challenge, not on the funded MFA account. The pricing widget publishes a price for only a fraction of the advertised size/tier combinations. No crawlable FAQ answers, terms or payout-method list: the first-payout window, a minimum and maximum withdrawal in currency, the approved payout methods and the trigger for the advertised 100% refund are all undisclosed. TrustPilot solicits its reviews (4.2/148, verified 2026-08-27).
Quant Tekel (Ascendx)
Pros
90% Profit Split
Cons
Reports of sometimes slow support

Active Deals & Promo Codes

MFA Traders
10% OFF 10% off 1-phase Challenge accounts
15% OFF 15% off 2-phase Challenge accounts
5% OFF 5% off Instant accounts
Quant Tekel (Ascendx)
60% OFF 50% off all Quant Tekel accounts

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better, MFA Traders or Quant Tekel (Ascendx)?

Both firms are competitive. MFA Traders wins in 2 categories while Quant Tekel (Ascendx) wins in 3. The best choice depends on what you prioritize: pricing, profit split, trust ratings, or payout speed.

Which is cheaper, MFA Traders or Quant Tekel (Ascendx)?

Quant Tekel (Ascendx) has the lower starting price at $10. MFA Traders offers 8 challenge options starting from $29, while Quant Tekel (Ascendx) offers 26 options starting from $10.

Which has better reviews, MFA Traders or Quant Tekel (Ascendx)?

MFA Traders has a higher TrustPilot rating of 4.3/5. MFA Traders has 165 reviews while Quant Tekel (Ascendx) has 13,074.

Which offers a higher profit split, MFA Traders or Quant Tekel (Ascendx)?

MFA Traders offers a higher maximum profit split. MFA Traders offers 65% (1-phase Beginner), 70% (Instant), 80% 85% 90% (2-phase Standard) while Quant Tekel (Ascendx) offers 80% (up to 90%).

How fast do MFA Traders and Quant Tekel (Ascendx) pay out?

MFA Traders has On demand payouts while Quant Tekel (Ascendx) offers 14 Days (2 Step / 2 Step Elite), Bi-weekly (Pay When Funded 1 Step), On-Demand (Power) payouts. Payout speed can be an important factor when choosing a prop firm.

Are MFA Traders and Quant Tekel (Ascendx) legit?

Both firms have been independently verified by PropFirmMap. MFA Traders holds a B+ safety grade and a 4.3/5 TrustPilot rating. Quant Tekel (Ascendx) holds a B+ safety grade and a 3.8/5 TrustPilot rating. Safety grades are based on payout history, community trust signals, and regulatory transparency.

Which is better for beginners, MFA Traders or Quant Tekel (Ascendx)?

Quant Tekel (Ascendx) may be more accessible for beginners due to its lower entry price. When starting out, consider challenge cost, drawdown rules, and profit split. Use the comparison table above to find which firm fits your experience level and risk tolerance.

Where these two rank in the wider market

A head-to-head answers "which of these two". These lists answer "is either one actually the best choice" - every firm we track, ranked side by side.

Browse every best-of prop firm list

Not sold on either? Explore alternatives

See the closest-matched prop firms ranked head-to-head against each contender, with live 2026 prices and safety grades.